ANTiLAG
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,014
Haha. Yeh I 'lacked the chops' to finish highschool
Whatever I say about my education you will shoot me down, "anyone can make things up on the Internet".
But I'll be honest. Im 20 and finished highschool in 2008. Hated English, but it was compulsory and important for me to get a good UAI. I managed an 88 for it (Adv. English). I'll admit it was largely due to memorizing pre-written essays I made before the exam and changing them to suit the question, but 1/2 the marks came from analysis you had to do in the exam on separate questions. At uni now doing engineering, but Ill admit they arn't exactly known for their english skills.
I'm comfortable with my level of education. But feel free to have more pot shots at me.
Then I suggest in order to improve your comprehension that you break down arguments into bare premises and check the validity of the logic. You suggesting that the causation of club combinations is invalid because Bedsy played subsequently without Joey in '04 and onwards is horrible, as it overlooks that by then Bedsy was then an incumbent in a winning team. Thus, he got his initial shot to displace Priddis, because Priddis played in a losing team that had Kimmorley as its halfback is not invalid because of events subsequent, as you suggest. Rather the argument that Kimmorley was dropped for Joey in '02, and Bedurus had the advantage of having a grand final club combination with Joey still stands. It was about how Priddis lost his spot to begin with.
It should never have been that hard for you to grasp if you're an engineer. Clearly you prefer numbers to words.