Gobsmacked
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,239
‘A timeline that makes sense’: PNG’s bid to become 18th NRL team firms with big ‘promise’
‘A timeline that makes sense’: PNG’s bid to become 18th NRL team firms with big ‘promise’
Wouldn't those sports have to be popular though?Correlation doesn't imply causation.
The short answer to your question is "fumbleball has more active fans around the country". If metro reach was so important then Super Rugby and A-League would be bigger than the NRL.
Has lower tv audience than nrl and massively more media and sponsorship revenue, hmmm maybe tv And advertisers prefer national metro reach?Correlation doesn't imply causation.
The short answer to your question is "fumbleball has more active fans around the country". If metro reach was so important then Super Rugby and A-League would be bigger than the NRL.
Has lower tv audience than nrl and massively more media and sponsorship revenue, hmmm maybe tv And advertisers prefer national metro reach?
www.footyindustry.com
What a surprise. A national game gets more money than a game played in 3 states. How to we change that?AwFuL games run longer and squeeze in more breaks for commercials.
Sponsors are willing to pay more for an advertisement during an AwFuL game.
In 2012, the ABC reported that the cost of advertising in the 2012 Grand finals wasAFL: $100,000 nationally or $50,000 in MelbourneNRL: $70,000 to $80,000 nationallyAFL/NRL Grand Final Advertising costs - Sports Industry AU
The Australian reports that Nine Network is selling 30-second advertising slots in Sunday’s 2016 NRL grand final for about $75,000www.footyindustry.com
What a surprise. A national game gets more money than a game played in 3 states. How to we change that?
Bring in a team from PNG. Brilliance.





That doesn’t explain why sponsors pay afl more or why ptv pays them a hell of alot more, or why fta pays them doubleAwFuL games run longer and squeeze in more breaks for commercials.
Sponsors are willing to pay more for an advertisement during an AwFuL game.
In 2012, the ABC reported that the cost of advertising in the 2012 Grand finals wasAFL: $100,000 nationally or $50,000 in MelbourneNRL: $70,000 to $80,000 nationallyAFL/NRL Grand Final Advertising costs - Sports Industry AU
The Australian reports that Nine Network is selling 30-second advertising slots in Sunday’s 2016 NRL grand final for about $75,000www.footyindustry.com
That doesn’t explain why sponsors pay afl more or why ptv pays them a hell of alot more, or why fta pays them double
What a surprise. A national game gets more money than a game played in 3 states. How to we change that?
Bring in a team from PNG. Brilliance.
www.footyindustry.com
www.footyindustry.com
Isn't he? ...Rupert MurdochMurdoch is not a Victorian.
Facts not "feelings"
But I’m not talking about club revenue, I’m talking about central revenue. for example Toyota pay over 50% more for naming rights to the afl than telstra pay nrl for same thing.AwFuL to NRL membership ratio is 4:1. Members buy merchandise that has the sponsors' logos on display. It's a great way to market their product. It's also viewed as a game that's supported by all classes.
FTA pays more because it gets to screen the non-Victorian teams into their home market. Ch9 would pay more if they got to screen every Broncos game into Brisbane.
Foxtel have been screwing with RL since 1998. Murdoch is a Victorian and admitted he "prefers" fumbleball and views it as Australia's premier game.
But I’m not talking about club revenue, I’m talking about central revenue. for example Toyota pay 50% more for naming rights to the afl than telstra pay nrl for same thing.
would they? Would they pay double what they pay now? And basically you’re agreeing with me lol ch7 pay more as afl has a 5 metro reach. as does ptv as does telstra for its connections.
murdoch is a hard core businessman first and foremost, news ltd aren’t paying any more than they value it at, and that’s more than they value nrl despite nrl having bigger audiences, so what’s different? Well afl has 16 of 18 clubs in 5 Australian metro markets, nrl has 13.5 Australian clubs in 3 metro markets, hmmmmm.
No it’s not, there’s multiple factors why we generate less revenue. But lack of national metro reach is certainly one of them. It creates a perception for sponsors, and tv, of a lessor market penetration limited to fewer metro markets. But yeh having Vlandys negotiating tv deals doesn’t help. The game doesn’t have the penetration in melbourne that afl has in Sydney And has virtually zero in perth and adleiade. Address that and we will start to see us catch up. Or we could go to Vegas lolWhilst I agree that metro reach is somewhat important, I don’t think it is anywhere near the only factor.
They have better negotiators for one and they also don’t have their head so far up News Ltd’s a*** as well. Longer games and more ad breaks would also be another.
No it’s not, there’s multiple factors why we generate less revenue. But lack of national metro reach is certainly one of them. It creates a perception for sponsors, and tv, of a lessor market penetration limited to fewer metro markets. But yeh having Vlandys negotiating tv deals doesn’t help.
Smith negotiated an outstanding fta deal, $70mill a year more than current deal and more than afls ch7 deals, sadly he wasnt given the opportunity to do fox over.Who has negotiated a good NRL TV deal?
Smith negotiated an outstanding fta deal, $70mill a year more than current deal and more than afls ch7 deals, sadly he wasnt given the opportunity to do fox over.
