What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Queen announce first album in 13 years

choc_soldier

Coach
Messages
10,387
Queen announce first album in 13 years
20 March 2008

Legendary rock group Queen today announced their first new album in 13 years and gave details of a European tour later this year.


The yet-to-be-named album will be released on September 1 and will feature Paul Rodgers, who joined the band as its frontman after Freddie Mercury's death in 1991, according to the band's website.


Rodgers, Brian May and Roger Taylor have already recorded the album, which will be the first since Made in Heaven was released in 1995.


It is timed for release two weeks before the group's seven-week tour through 14 European countries.


The tour will kick off in Moscow on September 16 and then move through Poland, Germany, Belgium, France, Italy, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Britain, Spain, Hungary, Serbia, the Czech Republic and Austria.


Queen's performance in Poland will be a free concert at the Gdansk Shipyard, the cradle of the 1980s Solidarity trade union movement.


Queen's website said that a tour of Latin America would follow, but did not give details.



http://www.smh.com.au/news/music/qu...bum-in-13-years/2008/03/20/1205602522607.html


No Queen album will ever sound genuine without Freddie obviously, but it'll be interesting to hear it all the same.
 

JB

Juniors
Messages
863
Very cool.

Rodgers is his own man and doesn't attempt to do the Freddie thing (tbh who could?). Obviously it's not going to be the same without Freddie, but to their credit, their not trying to be. It is something new.

Anyway's, anything that has the virtuoso abilities of guitar god Brian May playing on it will be worth listening to.
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
Apart from the Flash Gordon soundtrack, I haven't come across a Queen album I've not completely fallen in love with.

I can't wait.
 

beave

Coach
Messages
15,682
Red Bear said:
which was generally what freddy mercury had


haha, was going to say the same thing.


Is it true that Mika (or whatever his stupid name is) was being touted as a possible new singer for Queen???
 

JB

Juniors
Messages
863
beave said:
haha, was going to say the same thing.


Is it true that Mika (or whatever his stupid name is) was being touted as a possible new singer for Queen???

No. Well at least not by the band.

No secret he's a big fan of the group and i think Brian May might have played at one of his gigs.

There's been a few singers touted as replacements by journalists and tabloids. George Michael, Robbie Williams, Justin Hawkins (The Darkness) to name a few, and all have played with them at various event's. But the remaining members never seriously considered anyone until Paul Rodgers.
 

Ron Jeremy

Coach
Messages
25,689
TBH i think Justin Hawkins would be a great replacement, his range is probably better then Mercurys.
 

Misanthrope

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
47,627
which was generally what freddy mercury had

That doesn't make me want to experience it any more, given the end he met <_<

Annoying though Mika might be, his voice is a good fit.
 

Simo

First Grade
Messages
6,702
I think in a situation like this they should not release under the name queen. Freddy was to big a part of it.

They have enough pull to market it under a new name, its like nirvana without kurt, the jimi hendrix experience without jimi, guns n roses with just axl.

If Dave Grohl can pull it off surely people with the talent of May and co. can do it under a new, even similar but different name that represents the new band.

Queen needs Freddie in my opiion to be Queen.
 

Nuke

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
5,436
It's not Queen. They're calling themselves 'Queen + Paul Rodgers' ... have a look at their live cd & dvd ('Return Of The Champions'), website (www.queenpluspaulrodgers.com), ect.

Incidentally, that cd and dvd is an awesome show. It's not Queen (as others have said and will continue to say, Queen is not Queen without Freddie, and to a lesser extent John Deacon), but Freddie is included in the show via video screen. He starts Bohemian Rhapsody, the video screen does the operatic part (as all Queen shows have done since 1975 when BoRhap was released, except obviously they just used the recording played over the PA at this bit without any video screens), then Paul Rodgers comes in, does the rockin' part, then finishes the song in a duet with Freddie on the video screen.

There are a lot of old-school Queen fans who are viciously against this project (again, they state that nothing labelled 'Queen' should be called 'Queen' without Freddie and John), and on the official Queen forum, they quite openly vent their spleens to whoever will read about just about anything new.

For those who are interested, the new album will be called something like 'Rocks The Cosmos', and contain all new songs (suprisingly for me, none will feature Freddie vocals from tracks recorded but never finished or released), and for the first time ever on a Queen album, they will be doing a cover version. There's been no hints thus far of what song that may be. Prior to this album, no song has featured on any Queen album (bar a couple of live albums) that was written by anyone outside of the four members of the group. But I suppose it's not 'Queen' though, this one, is it?!

Album gets released September 1st 2008 (in the UK anyway). I can't wait, although I am a tad hesitent on getting my hopes up. They released a single called 'Say It's Not True' (in aid of the Nelson Mandela charity '46664') which is from this new album, is good, but not something a non-Queen fan would go for. It feels kinda rushed to me.

I am bitterly disappointed that Australia was left off the tour schedule. There is a group called Aussie Queens who worked tirelessly for about 2 years to try and get them to come to Australia, accumulating signatures for a petition, ect. The couple of people who run the group invested in excess of $5,000 of their own money to put it all together, and for what? Nothing it seems. I do believe that if sales are healthy enough, and they sell enough tickets on their European tour later this year, they may extend their tour to have a third leg (the 2nd being South and probably North America / Canada), which could include Japan, Australia, New Zealand, ect.
Personally, I doubt it though. I believe they'll do legs 1 and 2, but that'll be it ... possibly forever.
 

carcharias

Immortal
Messages
43,120
This is bad

That would be like if Bon Scott ever dies and ACDC replaced him.

Pftttt they woudn't last 1 year.
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
Ron Jeremy said:
TBH i think Justin Hawkins would be a great replacement, his range is probably better then Mercurys.
I highly doubt any musician has a range greater than Freddie's
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
Simo said:
I think in a situation like this they should not release under the name queen. Freddy was to big a part of it.

They have enough pull to market it under a new name, its like nirvana without kurt, the jimi hendrix experience without jimi, guns n roses with just axl.

If Dave Grohl can pull it off surely people with the talent of May and co. can do it under a new, even similar but different name that represents the new band.

Queen needs Freddie in my opiion to be Queen.
even the Queen part of Queen + Paul Rodgers isn't really Queen. It's just Roger Taylor and Brian May.

Deacon retired not long after the Freddie Mercury Tribute concert and vowed to never play as "Queen" again.

Brian has been doing cameo's in a sh*tload of Foo Fighters concerts all over Europe of late. He'd be better off slipping into their line up than clinging onto the past through Queen.

That said, I'm still going to buy this new album, You can't take anything away from May's guitar playing, singing and song writing skills. He's truly one of the best thats ever existed
 

Nuke

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
5,436
Brian May is a deadset legend. Roger Taylor is very underrated as a musician: a great drummer, on his good days a great song-writer (I'm not the biggest fan of a lot of his songs, but he has written some absolute pearlers, both for Queen and as a solo artist), can -and has- played a bit of rythem-guitar, and is a fantastic back-up singer. He's not too shabby as a lead singer either, but it's by far not his strength.

John did come out of retirement once to join Brian and Roger for the 1997 Queen song 'No-One But You (Only The Good Die Young)' which they put as an extra track on their Queen Rocks cd. It's a shame he's retired, but it was his choice, and he went out on top.

I've gotten sidetracked and have forgetten the point I was going to make now. Ah yes. This Q+PR band -as hard as it is for everyone (Queen fans and casual music lovers alike) to do- shouldn't be looked as the same band of Queen. They are very different in a lot of ways, but of course very much the same in a lot of others. Paul Rodgers is much more bluesy than Freddie was, so he brings that style to the songs, and somehow it works. Having the name Queen in the title is there -I believe- to bring in the casual music lover who may not know who Brian and Roger are (especially the younger generation), however it of course then brings endless comparisons to the real Queen (Freddie, John, Brian, Roger) - which is unfair. Like I said in my previous post, a lot of long-time Queen fans are boycotting Q+PR and hate anything to do with it simply because they refuse to like anything under the Queen label that doesn't include Freddie (and to a lesser degree, John).
My dad is a music lover. He has the widest range of music tastes of anyone I have ever known. He has never disliked Queen, but wasn't particularly interested in them (or the Rolling Stones either). Even after about 14 years of me being a huge fan, he never showed a great deal of interest. When I brought home Q+PR's 'Return Of The Champions' cd, he was interested to hear what they sounded like and borrowed the cd off me. He loved it, and within a week had obtained a copy himself. My mum -who's not very musically inclined and who's music tastes are of 50s-60s-70s music only- also said she wanted to borrow my cd! She has never before or since borrowed any of my cds, yet she borrowed (and liked) this one.

Q+PR is a great band, but will never reach the hights it possibly should because people will forever compare it to Queen ... and frankly, no-one can ever get close to that level (!). Therefore, it is doomed from the start to be a disappointment in the music world's eyes.
 

Nuke

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
5,436
Geez I can go on, can't I?!

I apologise to all for my novels here!
 

Ron Jeremy

Coach
Messages
25,689
madunit said:
I highly doubt any musician has a range greater than Freddie's
There are plenty...... Freddie had a great voice, no question, he was one of the best, but RJD, Hawkins, Bruce Dickinson and Axl i reckon have his measure, those blokes have range outta this world, however none of them are showman which what also reiterated the point of Freddie being a great front man.
 

Ron Jeremy

Coach
Messages
25,689
madunit said:
even the Queen part of Queen + Paul Rodgers isn't really Queen. It's just Roger Taylor and Brian May.

Deacon retired not long after the Freddie Mercury Tribute concert and vowed to never play as &quot;Queen&quot; again.

Brian has been doing cameo's in a sh*tload of Foo Fighters concerts all over Europe of late. He'd be better off slipping into their line up than clinging onto the past through Queen.

That said, I'm still going to buy this new album, You can't take anything away from May's guitar playing, singing and song writing skills. He's truly one of the best thats ever existed
May apparently has played on Gunners infamous Chinese democracy album, well they're the rumors anyway.
 

Latest posts

Top