I recently had a look up to the old Sam Burgess threads, of which there are a few, from when he was in the process of resigning.
The issue of gutting the clubs depth was brought up numerous times, both by some of our fans and fans of other clubs.
The line that many trotted out was 'Sam is worth it'. He can do it all on his own. He'll lift others. He'll get the twins back firing. And here's the interesting part. Many on here said we don't need that extra depth, guys like Turner, Clark and Tyrrell just have to do their jobs and Sam will do the rest.
We have to do something, we finished 7th that year.
Now fast forward almost 2 years.
Most of us would offer our firstborn sons for a 7th place finish.
Sam can't do it all on his own. That's actually the catchphrase now 'Sam is having to do it all on his own and it's not working'.
Sam hasn't lifted the twins. They've actually gotten far worse.
Guys like Turner, Clark and Tyrrell are still doing the same job, But now it's not good enough, they are duds and have to be sacked.
It's probably why I'm so defensive of that trio. They and guys like them were a big part of not only our rise, but our premiership and also our finals appearance the next year. They were always going to be the ones to cop it if the Sam signing turned out to be a dud. There's no way the burgii would be blamed, it was always going to be that trio. And the thing is that all 3 are sacked, i don't see how we actually improve our team. We could trade all 3 and possibly buy a good prop, but as good as that prop goes, our forward pack will always depend on how the Burgii go. If we sack all 3 for rookies and journeyman it also doesn't our team. Our forward pack that we build our game plan around will always come down to the burgii, whether it be by them performing, or by getting in quality players in on their wages that will