Willow
Assistant Moderator
- Messages
- 110,058
I thought this 'crackdown' was driven by the product image. That is, it had less to do with player welfare. If it was truly about players getting hurt, then why aren't we seeing the MRC citing dozens of incidents every week?
But I find myself in a conundrum. If it is about image, then why pull out the Ravalawa tackle? It was one the safest tackles you can do, nowhere near the head. Did someone call it dangerous at the time? Was it placed on report? It didn't even make the highlights video.
The V'landys edict about player safety has either lost it's way or is complete bullshit.
Moreover, the edict is actually damaging the game's image. It has actually become counter-productive to what I believe was it's original purpose.
But I find myself in a conundrum. If it is about image, then why pull out the Ravalawa tackle? It was one the safest tackles you can do, nowhere near the head. Did someone call it dangerous at the time? Was it placed on report? It didn't even make the highlights video.
The V'landys edict about player safety has either lost it's way or is complete bullshit.
Moreover, the edict is actually damaging the game's image. It has actually become counter-productive to what I believe was it's original purpose.