I mentioned earlier on this matter not to get your hopes up with Rava.
The MRC had already charged him. We all got on and read the NRL definition of “shoulder charge” and that basically wrap arms around a strong indication no shoulder charge.
Yet MRC still charged him.So I was thinking why? and actually posted that it must mean that a rejigging of “shoulder charge” definition is at play whereby the time delay between the 1st shoulder contact to the arm wrapping occurring in the tackle is a ‘new’ consideration but not yet explained or disclosed (I gather). I thought that would be a way the MRC and thereafter Judiciary could sink Rava even though he arm wrapped. Yes I follow Dragons but thought any ‘delay‘ in this case looks fraction of second. It looked a real good low tackle but hey I’m only fan.
Then I noticed that the honchos were redefining certain hits to the head, citing Robson? from Cows on Monday as exhibit one. I thought that this would open the way for the Roosters chap to get off.
Sure enough the NRL ‘prosecutor’ argued the arm wrap by Rava was ‘belated’. It all seems nuanced and in milliseconds. Doesn’t matter, the Judiciary members then took 5 mins to suspend Rava and Easts chap off in 10 mins.
At the end of the day all dragons fans must realise that our appeals and ‘bleating‘ are probably laughed at by the NRL, it’s MRC and Judiciary and any speculation of bias is water off the ducks back. It probably causes a double down. In effect, our club has zilch influence or power these days. Plus the NRL know that fans are emotionally invested in following their teams, it is tribal. Therefore, we are the useful idiots if we are honest with ourselves.
You can either keep ‘sucking it up‘ and watch the red v go around for a few more years; or simply walk away, get the kids into soccer or aussie rules, cancel club membership and then Foxtel etc. The later is a big bridge to walk over …agreed?