- Messages
- 20,177
Yes he did Hodgson, who has been with Canberra last 2.5 yearsHe did? Where’s he played the past 2.5 years?
Yes he did Hodgson, who has been with Canberra last 2.5 yearsHe did? Where’s he played the past 2.5 years?
Yeah and he chose to go to the UK to play second division instead!!
Or the best …..Lmao. This post could very easily become the silliest in 23.
Yes he did Hodgson, who has been with Canberra last 2.5 years
Or the best …..
Then good stuff by Mahoney, but will doubt the dogs are getting value from him (and I wanted to keep Mahoney but not on $800k or so a year)and what would your opinion be if rheed is the signing of the year?
I was sure it was mentioned it was a four year contract and this says it is. So around 600k a year.Then good stuff by Mahoney, but will doubt the dogs are getting value from him (and I wanted to keep Mahoney but not on $800k or so a year)
It’s a source offI was sure it was mentioned it was a four year contract and this says it is. So around 600k a year.
Bulldogs make “the signing of the decade” as Mahoney signs deal
The Bulldogs continue their impressive recruitingwww.sen.com.au
It’s a source off
$800k x 3 years.
‘No regrets at all’: Kikau remains committed to Canterbury
Viliame Kikau has no second thoughts about his move next year, with the Bulldogs confirming there were no Trent Barrett clauses in his nor Reed Mahoney’s deals.www.smh.com.au
Yeah Josh already posted that. I think you'll find that article has the number of years wrong.It’s a source off
$800k x 3 years.
‘No regrets at all’: Kikau remains committed to Canterbury
Viliame Kikau has no second thoughts about his move next year, with the Bulldogs confirming there were no Trent Barrett clauses in his nor Reed Mahoney’s deals.www.smh.com.au
Or yours is wrong. I’d check on the NRL signings tracker, only they haven’t registered his contract yet.Yeah Josh already posted that. I think you'll find that article has the number of years wrong.
“Ya GoT a SoUrCe FoR dAt”????the $800k source only just appeared. It was always rumored to be 600-650 per year.
Well given that multiple articles reported it as four years, and there appears to be just one article reporting three years, what do you think is most likely?Or yours is wrong. I’d check on the NRL signings tracker, only they haven’t registered his contract yet.
Whatever Gronk posts.Well given that multiple articles reported it as four years, and there appears to be just one article reporting three years, what do you think is most likely?
“Ya GoT a SoUrCe FoR dAt”????
The one from last week ?Well given that multiple articles reported it as four years, and there appears to be just one article reporting three years, what do you think is most likely?
You guys are so transparent. It just has to be that he left for low coin, because if he left for $800k, you wouldn’t be able play the blame game.Do wrong ones count? Or only if you’re a mod?
Women’s Weekly.“Ya GoT a SoUrCe FoR dAt”????