Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 91,379
Do you really think the game plan was the problem today? Passing side to side and one handed f**king put downs? The problem was attitude. Even the idiot coach recognised it in the presser.
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Do you really think the game plan was the problem today? Passing side to side and one handed f**king put downs? The problem was attitude. Even the idiot coach recognised it in the presser.
We absolutely do not. You can tell by the difference in the number of passes and runs made by various players each week, for example.
The issue is that the core business of the organisation (playing NRL) is also not neccessarily impacting the governance of the business, which is ultimately what all those useless f**kers are here for.
Gaslighted by
But can we trust/believe what you post about your thoughts, when you bore the shit out of everyone in game threads with brainless trolling repetitive nonsense win lose or draw?
But no-one cares and its irrelevent to what others were posting. Ffs.
That's because he was running sideways looking for some merkin to pass to.
I'm wearing one right now.
Most players have weaknesses and for some it's low work rate. If Lane was also a toiler he would cost more under the cap. To get a player for the same price who wasn't lazy he would be less dangerous with the ball. There's always a trade off. For us we deal with low work rate players by controlling the ball. When we fail to control the ball we expose our defensive weaknesses.
Well there has to be a reason. Personally I think the team is overrated. We have some good players but not many real competitors. The best one is our selfish douchebag captain.
And neither do we. It's hardly 'on a regular basis'. We have only lost five games ffs. Three of them to top eight teams.
I don't think he signs players. I think you're using him as a proxy for the club as a whole when the reality is he is an employee, with a number of people above him in the pecking order. Half a dozen of his players would be earning more than him, which means they are more valued by the organisation. Plenty of them would have more influence.
I'm sure they were apoplectic that we beat them at all.
It's one big game where Melbourne shat themselves. They'd done it before (40-0) and they've done it since. Cleary happened to be the beneficiary that day. It absolutely ruined a grand final and let Manly win another one f**k his eyes
And that's the problem. They are that much better than us of course they underperformed when they played us. But we beat them and suddenly we're equals? Get your hand off it. No doubt there are Bulldogs fans now thinking they should be top six like we are. Based on one f**king game.
And Paul Green won a grand final. Now he's unemployed. Finals is a very small sample of games but merkins attach an outsized level of importance to them. Luck is a factor in any game, and even any sample of games. The bigger the sample the more meaningful is the ratio of wins to losses but even then some coaches are at stronger clubs than others. You're comparing apples with oranges.
I'm sure they're not intending to drop games against the shit sides. They just think they're too good to stick to the gameplan and bash the weak teams. They literally avoid the collision.
