I'm a loser baby...
Immortal
- Messages
- 42,876
C'mon Hook, just tell us about the weak gutted kids.
A drunken homeless person called me that once.Ricky calling Salmon a "weak-gutted dog as a kid" and also now as a person. Seriously, calling a kid that? What a f**kwit.
No self control in those press conferences. Its embarrassing to watch.Ricky Stuart is a f**kwit, always will be a f**kwit and will die a f**kwit.
Did he know you as a kid?A drunken homeless person called me that once.
If the NRL were fair dinkum they should fine him a minimum $100K and suspend him for the rest of the year. You cannot attack someone personally like that. Not publicly.No self control in those press conferences. Its embarrassing to watch.
It crossed a line.If the NRL were fair dinkum they should fine him a minimum $100K and suspend him for the rest of the year. You cannot attack someone personally like that. Not publicly.
You give them far too much respect. Motivated Parramatta is too good for Penrith. Only cheating Penrith has beaten Parramatta in their last 3 games.It’s balanced by the good luck of Penrith not turning up against us, twice.
Absolutely look at the record between the 2 teams since 2020 when Penrith started there dominance.You give them far too much respect. Motivated Parramatta is too good for Penrith. Only cheating Penrith has beaten Parramatta in their last 3 games.
Parra need to be at their best and hope that Penrith are off slightly. Some luck is necessary as well. That's happened 2 of the last 3 games.You give them far too much respect. Motivated Parramatta is too good for Penrith. Only cheating Penrith has beaten Parramatta in their last 3 games.
since 2020 when Penrith started there dominance
Parra need to be at their best and hope that Penrith are off slightly. Some luck is necessary as well. That's happened 2 of the last 3 games.
Assume they were both fully fit and played each other every week for the next 10 weeks. Do you really think Parra would win more games than Penrith?
What about if they played each other every week for 26 weeks?
You don't give Penrith enough respect. Even this bloke respects them:
Your arguments hinge on a very small number of origin and NRL games. But worse still you casually dismiss 95% of the data by saying they are "huge overachievers". I really don't think you can credibly assess Penrith's "ceiling" given such strong bias.Penrith are huge overachievers and have found a way to be up almost every week. Good luck to them. Parramatta has shown they aren’t capable of doing that. That doesn’t mean Penrith has to not take us seriously for us to have a chance. That’s rather disrespectful to our team who have shown that when they play their best they can beat anyone. You’re conflating consistency with ceiling which is the wrong thing to do. If you had told me in 2017 that Melbourne had to have an off day for us to win then I would have agreed with you because they clearly outclassed us across the park. The gulf is not so deep between the Panthers and Eels today. If they were so good then NSW wouldn’t have lost 2 of the last 3 origin series. I would say Penriths dominance is a reflection of the current standard of the competition.
How am I dismissing most of the data when I acknowledged the fact that Penrith are more consistent? (That’s not even debatable). Again you’re conflating consistency with each teams maximum capability.Your arguments hinge on a very small number of origin and NRL games. But worse still you casually dismiss 95% of the data by saying they are "huge overachievers". I really don't think you can credibly assess Penrith's "ceiling" given such strong bias.
I didnt say that Penrith has to "not take us seriously". I suggested that they need to be "off slightly". Of course its possible that Penrith and Parra can both be on and Parra wins but I'm suggesting its unlikely where as you are implying its likely. Big call to make based on a handful of games.
There is absolutely no way that you can convince me that Parra at their best are better than Penrith at their best. In fact, I'd argue that most rugby league fans would disagree with this.
You are using a couple of wins against Penrith to determine the 'maximum capability' of both sides.How am I dismissing most of the data when I acknowledged the fact that Penrith are more consistent? (That’s not even debatable).
I don't believe I am. I noted that comment in your earlier post and specifically addressed it. The Panthers at their best are better than the eels at their best imo.Again you’re conflating consistency with each teams maximum capability.
One of the games was against a 12 man Panthers sides so I think we can rule that one out. In the other game both teams were good but I dont think the Panthers played as well as they could of.I was responding to Pou saying that we beat Penrith because they didn’t turn up twice. Maybe they were just beaten by the better team on the day?
I'm certainly not suggesting that. Given Pou was only talking about 2 games I suspect he wasn't either.It’s nonsensical to say that we can only win if Penrith are below their best. That’s placing them on a pedestal to which they don’t belong.
Chalk and cheese. Penrith are just as effective as the storm were but they do it in a different way. The talent is spread more evenly across the team.They’re obviously a great team but I just don’t think their players are that good to be doing what they’re doing. How many of their players would you say are on track to be all time greats like the Storm had with Slater, Cronk, Inglis, Munster, Smith? I’d say probably Cleary and maybe Yeo if you’re being generous.
Penrith playing without a bunch of key players and also down a player for 10 mins yet still raiders don’t look like troubling them … adds a bit more credit to our effort last week
penrith are a great side …. Period !!