Eelementary
Post Whore
- Messages
- 57,234
Only a little? He’s cooked mate. He’s old and doesn’t have the heart anymore. Plus he’s old. The game has left him behind. Did I mention he’s old?
You forgot to mention that he's old.
Only a little? He’s cooked mate. He’s old and doesn’t have the heart anymore. Plus he’s old. The game has left him behind. Did I mention he’s old?
He's younger than DCE.Only a little? He’s cooked mate. He’s old and doesn’t have the heart anymore. Plus he’s old. The game has left him behind. Did I mention he’s old?
He was playing shit when we signed him in mid-2019.Because you can’t renegotiate a contract mid-term because he’s playing shit.
Anyone who thinks Hodgson is remotely near first grade standard knows nothing about rugby league.I definitely do. If you've got a player consistently isolated in the line he is going to miss tackles.
Well it did and I showed you why. Just like in previous years he has big games and quiet games, but this year his big games have been bigger, hence his career best averages in TB and metres. Ergo, he hasn't been "shit this year" unless you acknowledge he has been just as shit every year.Sorry to tell you, but your selective posting of tangential stats in all manner of forum threads isn't proving or disproving anything champ.
Except I told you how recency bias had affected my observations, just as it taints yours and the rest of the anti-stats brigade. If our last four games are more relevant to "this year" than our first four games then of course Paulo has been garbage. He missed two weeks and since he returned his output has been down, along with his minutes.Yeah... nah. What type of statistician worth their salt tries to explain away their own biases, instead of acknowledge them and learn from them
I'll keep posting them as long as ignorant, opinionated merkins keep hating them.- i.e. learning not to selectively post your irrelevant/tangential stats on here so much?!
So we don't know if he is a student of the game.
Plus of course the Broncos system should be strong but when players are coming out saying the coach has NFI not sure how strong it is..
As long as the coach thinks he's "remotely near first grade standard" I'll trust his opinion over a bunch of angry nuffies on a footy forum.Anyone who thinks Hodgson is remotely near first grade standard knows nothing about rugby league.
but you know that….this is just another one of your elaborate contrarian trolls
But then i am guessing lattrell and cody doesn't study the game eithet.No we do. I was just being sarcastic.
It has been stated and in glowing terms by some on fox and ch9 that he is and that he watches every game, takes notes works out what he can use and then tells Reynolds what he thinks they should do and work on and they go from there.
Now in contrast, when anyone in the media talks about our gifted number 6 or the Knights number six for that matter all they ever say is that they are casual, happy go lucky kids and that they don't watch games and that they do other stuff, which is what the modern kids of today are like. The players themselves in interviews have said as much, like they are cool and to hip to bother watching the sport that they supposedly fell in love with and played growing up and has given them a job that has made them want for nothing.
Hell who needs to study and work on boring old RL when you have all this natural talent and you are just too cool for cats baby!
Dylan only came out a few weeks ago in the media and said he needs to basically knuckle down and start learning the game more because during games he is missing opportunities. Yeah no sh*t brother? I can't remember which newspaper or article I read it in.
Again compare that to Reece who no matter who you speak to around the game says he works around the clock studying the game watching and learning. The 8th immortal about a month ago on the Sunday footy Show said something like, 'Did you hear that Kalyn?, obviously referring to Ponga, watch the games mate...Pleeease'.
But I don't need to even hear or read all that. If you watch the games after a while you can see which players are putting in extras on and off the field at training and which are not. Like hours a day extra every day both on the training paddock and at home watch video. Not an hour or two after the normal training session a couple of times a week, thinking that that is extras. Remember these guys are paid millions. How many executives that are paid millions keep the relative small ours a week footballers do?
When watching Dylan and Kalyn as examples but there are many others, it is for all their talents, so bleeding obvious that they don't and are not students of the game. If they were for example when Kalyn was playing fullback he would have addressed his inability to play as well on both sides of the field. As for Dylan he has no idea of timing and how to setup his inside or outside men consistently properly. He hasn't worked out as a playmaker how to rope a dope or even count numbers properly. He just basically gets the ball and just runs hard and relies on a dummy and step that all of the RL world has figured out after last year. So what else has he got? At least Moses has a brilliant kicking game that makes him valuable. I suppose Dylan is a great defender, but attacking prowess, at the moment without someone like Lane setting him up Dylbags has got very little.
The great 5/8ths and Halves set up their back rowers and players around them. All this talk that Dylan will shine when Lane comes back, sure he should improve somewhat that is an obvious given, but it is not what Dylan or the team should be relying on. Lane is not the playmaker here, Dylan is. He is the one that should be calling the plays and shots, telling the likes of Lane to go here or be there or play Marilyn or play Jezebel and that sort of thing. He at this stage of his development should have seen sooo many games and poured over sooo much video and trained and adjusted and refined that many plays hundreds if not thousands of times with his back rowers, centres and wingers that that we should all be marveling at his bag of tricks and superb timing and intelligence out their on the field be cause he has the attributes and talent if he applied himself correctly. Instead he is still at times struggling to draw and pass. What a freakin joke.
Like I said, I don't need to hear or read others around the game say that he and many others of his generation don't watch and study the game away from what the coaching staff make them do, it bleeding well shows who does and who doesn't beyond their natural talent. Unfortunately Dylbags and by enlarge our who club don't.
We aren't alone in this it is a real blight that has crept into the game over the last decade or so. I think it is St George that is trying to make it part of there ethos and procedures that the players start watching the full round of games during their time off on the weekends. We should make it mandatory as part of the job specs and requirements of being a Parra player, especially of the million dollar players. How many players don't voluntarily want to do so anyway staggers me.
We are v predictable until we offloadDBrowns plan is to stick onto he Left... Unfortunately teams also know this so prepare accordingly.
Agree with your thoughts, but again, you need to learn the word succinct.No we do. I was just being sarcastic.
It has been stated and in glowing terms by some on fox and ch9 that he is and that he watches every game, takes notes works out what he can use and then tells Reynolds what he thinks they should do and work on and they go from there.
Now in contrast, when anyone in the media talks about our gifted number 6 or the Knights number six for that matter all they ever say is that they are casual, happy go lucky kids and that they don't watch games and that they do other stuff, which is what the modern kids of today are like. The players themselves in interviews have said as much, like they are cool and to hip to bother watching the sport that they supposedly fell in love with and played growing up and has given them a job that has made them want for nothing.
Hell who needs to study and work on boring old RL when you have all this natural talent and you are just too cool for cats baby!
Dylan only came out a few weeks ago in the media and said he needs to basically knuckle down and start learning the game more because during games he is missing opportunities. Yeah no sh*t brother? I can't remember which newspaper or article I read it in.
Again compare that to Reece who no matter who you speak to around the game says he works around the clock studying the game watching and learning. The 8th immortal about a month ago on the Sunday footy Show said something like, 'Did you hear that Kalyn?, obviously referring to Ponga, watch the games mate...Pleeease'.
But I don't need to even hear or read all that. If you watch the games after a while you can see which players are putting in extras on and off the field at training and which are not. Like hours a day extra every day both on the training paddock and at home watch video. Not an hour or two after the normal training session a couple of times a week, thinking that that is extras. Remember these guys are paid millions. How many executives that are paid millions keep the relative small ours a week footballers do?
When watching Dylan and Kalyn as examples but there are many others, it is for all their talents, so bleeding obvious that they don't and are not students of the game. If they were for example when Kalyn was playing fullback he would have addressed his inability to play as well on both sides of the field. As for Dylan he has no idea of timing and how to setup his inside or outside men consistently properly. He hasn't worked out as a playmaker how to rope a dope or even count numbers properly. He just basically gets the ball and just runs hard and relies on a dummy and step that all of the RL world has figured out after last year. So what else has he got? At least Moses has a brilliant kicking game that makes him valuable. I suppose Dylan is a great defender, but attacking prowess, at the moment without someone like Lane setting him up Dylbags has got very little.
The great 5/8ths and Halves set up their back rowers and players around them. All this talk that Dylan will shine when Lane comes back, sure he should improve somewhat that is an obvious given, but it is not what Dylan or the team should be relying on. Lane is not the playmaker here, Dylan is. He is the one that should be calling the plays and shots, telling the likes of Lane to go here or be there or play Marilyn or play Jezebel and that sort of thing. He at this stage of his development should have seen sooo many games and poured over sooo much video and trained and adjusted and refined that many plays hundreds if not thousands of times with his back rowers, centres and wingers that that we should all be marveling at his bag of tricks and superb timing and intelligence out their on the field be cause he has the attributes and talent if he applied himself correctly. Instead he is still at times struggling to draw and pass. What a freakin joke.
Like I said, I don't need to hear or read others around the game say that he and many others of his generation don't watch and study the game away from what the coaching staff make them do, it bleeding well shows who does and who doesn't beyond their natural talent. Unfortunately Dylbags and by enlarge our who club don't.
We aren't alone in this it is a real blight that has crept into the game over the last decade or so. I think it is St George that is trying to make it part of there ethos and procedures that the players start watching the full round of games during their time off on the weekends. We should make it mandatory as part of the job specs and requirements of being a Parra player, especially of the million dollar players. How many players don't voluntarily want to do so anyway staggers me.
He was averaging over 100m a game and had his second highest career tackle efficiency of over 85%, which is decent for a centre. Are you making shit up again to suit your argument?He was playing shit when we signed him in mid-2019.
The power game is about completing sets and minimising the opposition's time in possession. We don't have the toilers to sustain any other style.Our players cant sustain it
I’m pretty sure every teams goal is about completing sets and minimizing the oppositions possession.The power game is about completing sets and minimising the opposition's time in possession. We don't have the toilers to sustain any other style.
Is DCE bald and had multiple ACL’s??? The bald thing is the most worrying.He's younger than DCE.
He is averaging more metres per game this year ffs. It doesn't mean he is playing well.He was averaging over 100m a game and had his second highest career tackle efficiency of over 85%, which is decent for a centre. Are you making shit up again to suit your argument?
It just means he was on more than the minimum salary. A player can be on double the minimum and still be on f**k all. That's only $240k this year. In 2019 it (twice the minimum) was $210k.Penrith’s CEO at the time Brian Fletcher was quoted providing further evidence that Waqa was contracted on decent coin with them:
“Ultimately it was a difficult decision to grant Waqa’s release but it will assist the management of our salary cap moving forward.”
(https://www.zerotackle.com/blake-leaves-penrith-to-join-eels-45687/)
If he wasn’t on big coin with them then moving him on wouldn’t make much difference to the management of their cap.
Which is why the Panthers had to pay him out. They had to pay him out, not us. Whether the payout was frontloaded into two or three years is between them. That's the price they had to pay to get him off the books. We negotiated separately based on what he was worth to us, and as we know, since MON came to the club we have consistently let merkins go than overpay for them.There’s no way he was leaving for less money
He was unwanted by his club and got a payout. And we were mid-table at the time while Penrith was languishing near the bottom.and we were also coming off a wooden spoon so would more than likely needed to pay overs to get him to move.
Journalist/accountants knowing the truth and sharing it with us? Unlikely. Even if it was factual, you'll note that that article included his negotiated payout figure from that year with Penrith, which we have no way of knowing. I just think it's bullshit. There's no reason Penrith would've had to pay stupid money to re-sign Blake, especially being aware of his shortcomings. For the same reason there's no way we would have agreed to match it given he was unwanted by his current club, a known quantity at NRL level, already mid-20s, and playing poorly at the time. O'Neill would have passed unless he was a genuine bargain, like RCG and Moses turned out to be. Obviously, as senior players in consistently good form, neither of them would be bargains these days. Blake in 2019 was more like Simonsson in 2021 - a low demand player in his mid-20s with potential improvement still in him. The difference is Blake was two years older than Simonsson when we signed him, and therefore with less upside.Finally, there was this article published in the SMH indicating Waqa was the 3rd highest paid centre in the game at $606,300.
Is your club paying too much for players? Confidential NRL document sheds light on salaries
The Herald has obtained the document the NRL salary cap auditors send clubs to keep agents honest and determine how much they should pay their players.amp.smh.com.au
See above, and thank you for giving me the opportunity to clarify my position.That’s plenty more evidence than “because I said so” which seems to be your position.
No, some teams are more able (defend your mistakes) and therefore more willing to play higher risk styles. This is reflected in their differing completion rates over 1900+ minutes of football each year.I’m pretty sure every teams goal is about completing sets and minimizing the oppositions possession.
Thanks for confirming “because I said/think so” is your only argument. Quality rebuttal.He is averaging more metres per game this year ffs. It doesn't mean he is playing well.
It just means he was on more than the minimum salary. A player can be on double the minimum and still be on f**k all. That's only $240k this year. In 2019 it (twice the minimum) was $210k.
Which is why the Panthers had to pay him out. They had to pay him out, not us. Whether the payout was frontloaded into two or three years is between them. That's the price they had to pay to get him off the books. We negotiated separately based on what he was worth to us, and as we know, since MON came to the club we have consistently let merkins go than overpay for them.
He was unwanted by his club and got a payout. And we were mid-table at the time while Penrith was languishing near the bottom.
Journalist/accountants knowing the truth and sharing it with us? Unlikely. Even if it was factual, you'll note that that article included his negotiated payout figure from that year with Penrith, which we have no way of knowing. I just think it's bullshit. There's no reason Penrith would've had to pay stupid money to re-sign Blake, especially being aware of his shortcomings. For the same reason there's no way we would have agreed to match it given he was unwanted by his current club, unproven in the NRL, and playing poorly at the time. O'Neill would have passed unless he was a genuine bargain, like RCG and Moses turned out to be. Obviously, as senior players, neither of them would be bargains these days. Blake in 2019 was more like Simonsson in 2021 - a low demand player in his mid-20s with potential improvement still in him. The difference is Blake was two years older than Simonsson when we signed him, and therefore with less upside.
See above, and thank you for giving me the opportunity to clarify my position.
Which team doesn’t care about completing sets? And which team doesn’t like controlling possession?No, some teams are more able (defend your mistakes) and therefore more willing to play higher risk styles. This is reflected in their differing completion rates over 1900+ minutes of football each year.
I've given you plenty of facts. Your argument amounts to "because sports journos said so". We know their agenda.Thanks for confirming “because I said/think so” is your only argument. Quality rebuttal.