What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Reynoldson loving NRL life in Newcastle

Stranger

Coach
Messages
18,682
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=3782

Living in a rugby league town was always a dream of rugged forward Kirk Reynoldson.

These days he would be forgiven for thinking it is a nightmare.

After three seasons in AFL-mad Melbourne with the Storm, Brisbane-born Reynoldson this year relished the chance to link with Newcastle where league is considered more than a mere sport.

Playing in a one team town makes the highs very high and the lows quite unbearable.

And right now Newcastle is as low as it can get.

The Knights' round seven clash against the Bulldogs at Newcastle on Sunday will mark their first game without Andrew Johns after the ex-Test No.7 broke his jaw last weekend.



To boot, Newcastle is the only win-less NRL team after six rounds - its worst season start - and the sole outfit not to have secured a naming rights sponsor.

Not that Reynoldson has to walk too far down the street to be reminded.

"It's one of those towns where you can't go to too many places without people saying something about footy - it's probably the hardest thing to get used to," Reynoldson said.

"It's just everyone loves the Knights. Newcastle's such a wonderful town - my wife and I love living here."

Reynoldson admits he has been shaking his head over the bad luck that has plagued the Knights in 2005.

"Most fans have always stuck by us, when you go down the street they stop you and say `just hang in there, you'll get there'," he said.

"They are the true fans, they are there for us through the good times and the bad.

"All we can do is just keep training hard, hopefully it filters into the game - it starts on the training paddock."

Newcastle's slide started with a pre-season controversy at Bathurst and the latest instalment was Johns' injury which will sideline him for up to eight weeks.

The Knights' heartbreak continued when forward Daniel Abraham broke his leg in the same game last Sunday and was ruled out for the rest of the season, taking the club's injury list to a staggering 12.

"It (Johns' injury) hits home pretty hard, also with Daniel. Those guys had been training hard and we had just got them back and been getting some cohesion - and then that happens," Reynoldson said.

"But we've got to battle on. I'm sure the guys who have come in will do a great job."

Newcastle looked to have finally broken its duck when it led 20-0 last Sunday against New Zealand Warriors, only to lose 30-26 in its first home game of 2005.

At least Reynoldson is finding positives.

"Taking one positive is that we put one 40 minute performance together - now we've got to come up with two halves," he said.

Another positive is former Test hooker Danny Buderus backing up from last weekend's season debut without any problems after finally overcoming foot/shoulder/elbow injuries.

"The fitness is good so I'm happy about that, it's a positive for me anyway," Buderus said.

"We've got to keep our heads up - you can't look too forward down the track....something unexpected always happens.

"It's pretty disheartening but another week, another challenge."

Buderus will also look at reclaiming his Test No.9 jersey after his three-year hold on the position was broken by Penrith's Luke Priddis for Friday night's clash against New Zealand.

"Putting Priddo there just makes me hungrier to try and get that jersey back and I'm looking forward to doing that."
 

northey

First Grade
Messages
7,380
Kirk_Reynoldson05.jpg


is the pic they used on www.nrl.com for teh artical
 

Jono078

Referee
Messages
21,201
I havnt been really happy with him this year either, but if you look at his stats, he has been one of our best and most consistent, and I beleive he is played best at Lock, not front row.
 

reladith

Juniors
Messages
252
wish he would actually do some work.
i have not been impressed with him this year

I havnt been really happy with him this year either, but if you look at his stats, he has been one of our best and most consistent, and I beleive he is played best at Lock, not front row.

Typical stupid f*cking knights supporters. If he doesn't score 2 tries rip the heart of the oppositions middle third all day and smash opponents with huge earth jarring shoulder charges he is crap.

Knights 2004 and Jono078, you blokes signify what is wrong with the reputation of knights supporters. Reynaldonson has been the knights most consistant performer over the last 6 weeks, has not been injured and is making 30+ tackles regularly and getting 100m to compliment it!

If you wanted Ben Kennedy we had to spend another 150k, we couldnt, we got Reynaldson, he is doing a fine job.

So boys go back to sitting on the hill and spinning shite, your words and opinions are out of place and just go to show how much you dont know about the game.

I.D.I.O.T.S
 

macavity

Referee
Messages
20,638
reladith - yes, he has been one of our better performers.

best of a bad bunch if you will.

but we still paid too much for him.
 

aqua_duck

Coach
Messages
18,629
He's been one of our best forwards but honestly thats not hard. Craig Smith is 34 years old can barely run and he's also been one of our best forwards.

Looking at Reynoldson this is his stats

metres p/g: 91
tackles p/g: 28.8
missed tackles p/g: 2.6
hit ups p/g: 12.2
metres p/ hit up: 7.5

His stats aren't bad but honestly they aren't great either. He's playing in a very inexperienced pack and needs to lead from the front, and 91 m per game is not leading from the front.
Coupled with the fact we paid almost rep value for him and its not looking too wise a move.
Reynoldson needs to be a 18 hit up 120m, 30 tackles a game player because he's not an impact forward, at the moment he's neither a workhorse nor a game breaker.
There are probably 50 forwards at other clubs who are on less money and who haved out performed the big man.

Lets compare him to a guy we missed out on who is on similar money (probably less) in Carl Webb

metres p/g: 141
tackles p/g: 14.8
missed tackles p/g: 2.2
hit ups p/g: 13.8
metres p/ hit up: 10.2

Webb's tackles are down but this is largely due to the fact that 1. We make alot more tackles than the cowboys, 2.Webb is used in bursts.

I don't see Reynoldson as a player capable of making 141 metres a game and 10.2 metres per hit up, so he's really got to increase his workrate.
 

Bring it home Knights

First Grade
Messages
7,575
A forwards meters in the nrl are largely due to the players around him. If reynoldson was in the back row like he is meant to be and had parsons and kennedy in the team laying the plat form before he came on, his stats would be much higher then they are now. Having said that, they are impressive for a team that hasn't got a real go forwards man.
 

macavity

Referee
Messages
20,638
BIHK - don't agree. Forwards can get decent meters without needing everyone else to be providing the platform.

Look at Rauhihi when the cows sucked - still made awesome metres.

I guess we will see how he goes when we have a full compliment. Ie never.

p.s. I think the bench is where he is supposed to be. We are paying him too much to be there though.

shame.
 

Bring it home Knights

First Grade
Messages
7,575
macavity said:
BIHK - don't agree. Forwards can get decent meters without needing everyone else to be providing the platform.

Look at Rauhihi when the cows sucked - still made awesome metres.

I guess we will see how he goes when we have a full compliment. Ie never.

p.s. I think the bench is where he is supposed to be. We are paying him too much to be there though.

shame.

hmmm. that is a very warped point you make
 

TooheysNew

Coach
Messages
1,109
How? It makes perfect sense. Why should a player's performance be based on how many metres there team mates make? What a stupid idea...
 

Bring it home Knights

First Grade
Messages
7,575
Dilmah said:
How? It makes perfect sense. Why should a player's performance be based on how many metres there team mates make? What a stupid idea...

Ok this is why. If a forward on the team does a good hitup he gets a quick play the ball, then the next bloke often does a better hitup as the other team aren't as set and are running back on side, then he makes great meters and gets a quick play the ball and so on and so on.

That is why the team mates play a big part in a players performance.
 

aqua_duck

Coach
Messages
18,629
I think Reynoldson needs to be the workhorse player in the pack, he's not good enough to be an impoact forward and make 150m from 15 hit ups, I'd like to see him play like he did today in terms of workrate, 35-40 tackles a game, 15-20 hit ups a game. If he can start doing this I think he can justify his salary.
 

Latest posts

Top