gallagher
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,800
Is he going at all? Is he off to the roosters? Is it Taylor who is going?
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...ahs-lawyer-20151121-gl4oqn.html#ixzz3s7dMhIA8
Lol. Farahs lawyer.
Is he going at all? Is he off to the roosters? Is it Taylor who is going?
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...ahs-lawyer-20151121-gl4oqn.html#ixzz3s7dMhIA8
It would be closer to the mark than "robbie is thy lord" posts.
Read the story, this prick's ego would see him destroy the club.
Whoever decided to offer Brooks and Moses $600k a season should be taken outside and shot in the knee.
At least Farah is an elite level player, Brooks and Moses are still rookies who have yet to cement themselves as FGers.
1.2 million in cap space for teenage rookies WTF is wrong with this pathetic club
I don't find it funny. Its pissing me off.
I think Taylor may actually be trying to turn things around but geez he is a muppet. Why not just work with Robbie until his contract is over. Still what idiot signed him for 4 years on top dollars.
Because if he kept working with Robbie for 2 years he knew it would be worse then this - That should prove how bad Robbie is that Taylor was willing to risk everything on what was alwasy going to be hugely controversial
Potter reportedly warned the board about signing Farah for no longer than 2 years but Mayer and co ignored his opinion,Brooks and Mosses are on massive overs for two rookies learning their trade,$600k per season for these two should really be spread over 4 seasons based on where they are atm in their careers. Again it's not the players fault that favourable contracts were offered to them but rather it reflexs poorly again of how dumb and desperate some of our board retention decisions have been.
Potter reportedly warned the board about signing Farah for no longer than 2 years but Mayer and co ignored his opinion,Brooks and Mosses are on massive overs for two rookies learning their trade,$600k per season for these two should really be spread over 4 seasons based on where they are atm in their careers. Again it's not the players fault that favourable contracts were offered to them but rather it reflexs poorly again of how dumb and desperate some of our board retention decisions have been.
I come in peace and am not looking to cause conflict here but I completely agree with you about the Potter situation. From an external point of view, I thought Mick Potter seemed to be doing an admirable, certainly in terms of results, up until all that Robbie Farah drama started. I too am also baffled as to why the club appointed Jason Taylor - arguably the coach with the worst people skills in the competition; there was a reason why no club asked for his services ever since he got sacked by Souths!This kills me. Potter saw that Robbie was not worth top dollar and he got shafted. I still don't get why we got rid of Potter and put Taylor in charge.
Could it be that Robbie Farah is just impossible to work with? I mean the last three coaches you guys have had have all had problems with Robbie Farah, what does that say? The guy has been a good player but he's a bad egg! As for four year deals, I completely agree. There are only a handful of players in the comp that I would sign on four year deals and Farah isn't one of them. Don't worry, its not as bad a decision as signing Tim Grant on a four year deal despite having spent the previous season prior to joining us playing mostly reserve grade.I don't find it funny. Its pissing me off.
I think Taylor may actually be trying to turn things around but geez he is a muppet. Why not just work with Robbie until his contract is over. Still what idiot signed him for 4 years on top dollars.
its not as bad a decision as signing Tim Grant on a four year deal despite having spent the previous season prior to joining us playing mostly reserve grade.