What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Roosters this season (game spoilers)

Messages
3,070
I have no problem with that call. I have my doubts that sides that rely on the refs like Souths would have had the try disallowed. The rest of the match was clearly refereed with a clear agenda. At least one of those refs will likely be dropped as a result.

Manly were pinged many dozens of times between 2007-2011 for the imaginary obstruction rule.. Post your complaints about them here & now and we can all sit & contemplate the fairness of it all.
 

Danny-Boy

Juniors
Messages
1,430
Here's a drink courtesy of the Manly boys.

cokezero.jpg


:lol::lol::lol:
 
Messages
3,070
Do you or do you not think Manly only deserved to be penalised twice.

If I questioned you on the validity of the penalties made against you I am fully aware of the stupidity that would come my way.

On balance I however am very well aware of the fair view I and other manly supporters make each & every game wether or not its against the roosters.

The roosters area team that lacks character & subscribes to whatever advantage politis can obtain. If you like that then that is your choice.
 

Chook Norris

First Grade
Messages
8,319
If I questioned you on the validity of the penalties made against you I am fully aware of the stupidity that would come my way.

On balance I however am very well aware of the fair view I and other manly supporters make each & every game wether or not its against the roosters.

The roosters area team that lacks character & subscribes to whatever advantage politis can obtain. If you like that then that is your choice.

It's actually a very simple 'yes' or 'no' answer.

'Yes' or 'no', Manly deserved to be only penalised twice tonight.
 

Chook Norris

First Grade
Messages
8,319
The Roosters lost despite being penalised less.

Penalised less? Roosters were penalised 11 times. Manly were penalised twice. How is that less? 11<2 ?

Also, still avoiding the simple 'yes' or 'no' answer :lol: says a lot really.

Maybe I need to repeat it a third time in simpler terms?

Manly were penalised only twice. Manly only deserved to be penalised twice. Yes or no?
 

Cockadoodledoo

First Grade
Messages
5,045
Penalised less? Roosters were penalised 11 times. Manly were penalised twice. How is that less? 11<2 ?

Also, still avoiding the simple 'yes' or 'no' answer :lol: says a lot really.

Maybe I need to repeat it a third time in simpler terms?

Manly were penalised only twice. Manly only deserved to be penalised twice. Yes or no?

Chook, you have to realize when you come here that you sometimes have to deal with the less fortunate, those who are part of a lower echelon of society that just didn't grow up with the basics like manners and education. I got a Bentley for my 21st birthday, Jatz Cracker stole a Kingswood.
 
Top