Cockadoodledoo
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,045
I counted them. Your team know no discipline. You got let off lightly for once.
Oh dear. The drop kick still doesn't get the point.
I counted them. Your team know no discipline. You got let off lightly for once.
I have no problem with that call. I have my doubts that sides that rely on the refs like Souths would have had the try disallowed. The rest of the match was clearly refereed with a clear agenda. At least one of those refs will likely be dropped as a result.
I counted them. Your team know no discipline. You got let off lightly for once.
Oh dear. The drop kick still doesn't get the point.
Oh dear. You dont get any differing point that doesnt gel with the your mindset.
Do you or do you not think Manly only deserved to be penalised twice.
If I questioned you on the validity of the penalties made against you I am fully aware of the stupidity that would come my way.
On balance I however am very well aware of the fair view I and other manly supporters make each & every game wether or not its against the roosters.
The roosters area team that lacks character & subscribes to whatever advantage politis can obtain. If you like that then that is your choice.
Ok for one last time, how do you explain how our poor discipline is responsible for receiving so few penalties?
It's actually a very simple 'yes' or 'no' answer.
'Yes' or 'no', Manly deserved to be only penalised twice tonight.
If anyone is looking for the Rorters they're in the
![]()
:lol::lol::lol:
The Roosters lost despite being penalised less.
The Roosters lost despite being penalised less.
Penalised less? Roosters were penalised 11 times. Manly were penalised twice. How is that less? 11<2 ?
Also, still avoiding the simple 'yes' or 'no' answer :lol: says a lot really.
Maybe I need to repeat it a third time in simpler terms?
Manly were penalised only twice. Manly only deserved to be penalised twice. Yes or no?
![]()
:lol::lol::lol: