It was great to see in the press conference that Griffin made no excuses just proud everyone gave 100 percent or better.And was happy that the supporters weren't happy
So basically, the try can't be reversed once the conversion is taken. If Lomax did a quick drop kick for goal before the video ref reached for his spectacles, then they couldn't overrule the on-field ref?It’s the new rule apparently. Ref now awards the try and bunker looks at it while they are setting up for the goal
So basically, the try can't be reversed once the conversion is taken. If Lomax did a quick drop kick for goal before the video ref reached for his spectacles, then they couldn't overrule the on-field ref?
Not happy with this over-engineering of the rules. On one hand they want to speed up the game, but then there's long stoppages with captain's challenge and the bunker sticking their noses in.
IMO, once the ref awards the try, that should be it.
I wonder what's next, contesting the match result after full time?
Agree. It’s bullshit that the ref awards a try and the game pretty much stops for a minute as the goal kicker waits for the video ref to confirm try/no try.Its just dumb.
Why the need to change it from last season is beyond me.
Waiting for a review, whilst frustrating is better than having a try awarded and then reversed.
Meanwhile the time clock is ticking away to your disadvantage.Its just dumb.
Why the need to change it from last season is beyond me.
Waiting for a review, whilst frustrating is better than having a try awarded and then reversed.
Well Wade Graham took a captain challenge with about 90 seconds to go - just to waste time ..So basically, the try can't be reversed once the conversion is taken. If Lomax did a quick drop kick for goal before the video ref reached for his spectacles, then they couldn't overrule the on-field ref?
Not happy with this over-engineering of the rules. On one hand they want to speed up the game, but then there's long stoppages with captain's challenge and the bunker sticking their noses in.
IMO, once the ref awards the try, that should be it.
I wonder what's next, contesting the match result after full time?
Agree, should have been sent; weak as piss! His winger mate who ran in should have at least gone to the bin as well.Interesting to see Ramien has been charged for his tackle on Dufty. Facing a 4 week suspension, early plea 3 weeks. Question is why wasn’t he sent off?? He gets 10 in the sin bin yet Dufty has a mandatory 15 min break.
Unbelievable
the new method for awarding trys then checking will be dropped once it happens to the Roosters or the Storm, until then we have to live with the stupidity of it.So basically, the try can't be reversed once the conversion is taken. If Lomax did a quick drop kick for goal before the video ref reached for his spectacles, then they couldn't overrule the on-field ref?
Not happy with this over-engineering of the rules. On one hand they want to speed up the game, but then there's long stoppages with captain's challenge and the bunker sticking their noses in.
IMO, once the ref awards the try, that should be it.
I wonder what's next, contesting the match result after full time?
Yeah but he’s an idiot..Well Wade Graham took a captain challenge with about 90 seconds to go - just to waste time ..
Dufty may well be the 'good young 6' weve been searching for....right under our noses.Dufty played 6 during his junior development days and was moved to fullback by Ben Hornby when Hornby and D Young were coaching the under 20s.
Like many juniors at that time, defence seem to be Dufty's main problem along with the fact that he needed room to weave his magic. So thus the move to fullback.
I would try Dufty at 6 in reseve grade first.to see how he goes. The other problem is that we have plenty of depth in the halves and would be likely to lose a good young 6 if Dufty became Normans replacement in 2022.
Dufty has had a few seasons now to address these issues and each year we hear the same story, he just needs more time. Maybe there is a halfway point where, when in defence, we swap Dufty for Ramsey and see how that goes.
Dufty played 7 in the juniors before he was turned into a 1 by HornbyDufty may well be the 'good young 6' weve been searching for....right under our noses.
I think he’s more suited to 5/8.With all respect to Duffy the man is undoubtedly a great attacking weapon , but alas the man’s defense is what truly matters . No team can afford to have a player whom simply cannot catch the pill in the fullback role - the last line of defense .
Too many errors on his part has gifted the opposition points , I would be giving him another opportunity in that position , but should he not stack up then have him on the bench and replace him with Ramsey .
The season only just beginning so now is the time for changes to occur before all is lost .
Hornby did ok going from a 1 to a 7Dufty played 7 in the juniors before he was turned into a 1 by Hornby
I thought so at first, but then I gave BOD because it resulted in them getting a scrum feed close to our line. But then they just ran backwards and kicked it into touch... so yeah... a time wasting exercise.Well Wade Graham took a captain challenge with about 90 seconds to go - just to waste time ..
is that you Corey?some good signs I thought - too many errors yet again cost them the game.
I thought Macca's service was good and he has some subtlety to his game - combo with Hunt has legs. He's no Damien cook but ya get what you pay for.
Fui is an edge and Kerr ain't - pretty clear. Tariq looks done but was always going to struggle on a wet track. How and why we did not recruit backrowers is beyond me.
Duff has errors in him but is needed in attack - his energy seems better and Cody ain't ready so lets give him a chance. The front row are not all stars but gave it plenty, showed some heart.
Clune is a backup only, never thought I'd say this but we'll improve w Corey back in the team. Good to see Bird get through - bit grabby in D but has a vibe the team is dearly lacking. Let him get his sea legs at centre but I think he'll be needed on an edge.
Interesting to see Ramien has been charged for his tackle on Dufty. Facing a 4 week suspension, early plea 3 weeks. Question is why wasn’t he sent off?? He gets 10 in the sin bin yet Dufty has a mandatory 15 min break.
Unbelievable
I agree that Dufty is a strike player in attack, but as a fullback his positional play is questionable. A traditional fullback of quality is the last line of defense in most situations and this is the area Dufty is deficient. It may be worthwhile to look at him as a 5/8. He is fast, elusive and has talent, maybe Hook might be able to get the best out of him. I would not write Dufty off at this stage.I think he’s more suited to 5/8.