If forwards are not getting a fast play the ball then halves wont do anything.
That is a myth. In several games this year, we have played the ball faster than our opponents. The forwards aren't necessarily killing it, but they have certainly delivered enough field position for the team to score. Those games were:
Eels (3.15 vs 3.67)
Tigers (3.47 vs 3.57)
Sharks (3.25 vs 3.7)
South's (2.97 vs 3.32)
Tigers (3.15 vs 3.32)
Warriors (3.47 vs 3.59)
Let's be clear, we have had faster play the ball speed in 6 out of 10 games and we beat the Knights when we had a slower play the ball speed than them.
It has been posted on here that Cleary coached teams finish bottom or 2nd bottom in attack over a number of seasons showing how poor he is at coaching attack. He has James Maloney, a proven rep quality playmaker with premierships under his belt, loads of big game experience and more than half an idea of how to get teams to score. In 9 seasons he averages 16 try assists a year. Last year when Cleary was injured he run the team and by all accounts the attack coaching and we were winning games. This year he seems to be letting Nathan do more, but he is still getting us multiple repeat sets so we can build pressure. We have had 332 tackles in the opposition 20 for a total of 21 tries. By way of perspective, the Roosters have 216 tackles in the opposition 20 for a total of 44 tries.
We can't beat the bare facts. Who is responsible for creating tries? Surely it is the spine players with the halves the primary providers. Certainly the players in the NRL top 20 try assist table are all spine players except for Latrell Mitchel and Kenny Bromwich. Our spine is average at best. Our backs are ridiculously error prone and have very little in the way of playmaking skills. Gus has to take some responsibility for that, since he greatly influenced recruitment. However, it hasn't been a problem for three years.
My personal view is the problem is not the forwards. It is:
1. The team isn't fit or strong enough. A common theme with Cleary teams. Witness the years of injuries we had in his first stint at Panthers. Errors and penalties happen when a team is fatigued and we tick both those boxes.
2. Cleary can't coach attack and the stats he has delivered in his career prove this. His game plans are devoid of creativity and flair. He wants mistake free, steady hit ups and then to score when we are in the red zone. How is that working out?
3. Having a coach with his son playing in the team is a massive conflict of interest and other players would resent the nepotism. I just can't see how it can work and the signs are there that it isn't. What happens when he has a stinker? Will he get dropped? His errors shown up in video sessions? Will he be tried at hooker? Gower and Johns whom are far superior players to Cleary had a spell there. It is so glaringly obvious that he should be given a run there and put Luai into the halves.
It should never have been allowed. If he wants to coach his son, then we should have let Nahan go. He has never, ever, shown he was going to be an elite level halfback. Good, steady, Mitchel Pearce quality at best and there is nothing wrong with that.