GongPanther
Referee
- Messages
- 28,676
f**k THE REFS. They just gave obstruction for the same thing as Maloney's one.
You mean't every other obstruction that they always ruled on. That bloke in the bunker added a new paragraph to the description when he was ruling on Maloney. IMO,where the indescretion first happened is where the rule should had first been applied,and not by how Maloney reached him a second time. If Maloney had been a forward instead of a zippier half,we wouldn't have been talking about this loss.
This is an A-class tefereeing/bunker bungle. But no,we couldn't have the Dogs on 0-3 could we? At least we are in the top 8 with only 22 rounds to go.