I do not understand the comment "if Lomax fails then coach gets the outcome he is looking for".
Mary may be a below average coach but to insinuate that he wants young players to fail is ridiculous.
Coach loves the status quo and doesn't like having to make tough decisions.
When he is confronted by having too many players for a position he more often than not errs on there side of seniority.
If young players have a poor game (emphasis on 'a') it is then very easy for coach and if you understand anything about this forum it is the most basic and constant of criticisms about coach and the club i.e. the non promotion or retention of juniors in 1st grade.
Coach doesn't like doing it and avoids it whenever he can and only injury or retirements forces the change.
Even some people in this forum are like it and are hanging onto Lomax's indifferent trial form as to the reason he didn't get a start in 1st grade rather than looking at his end of season form. Tell me if Aitken's from was any better or more compelling to be reinstated into 1st grade?
Coach wanted Aitken and he wasn't going to have it any other way and his job was made very easy by Lomax having a bit of a Barry Crocker whilst playing out of position outside a poor player.
Objective achieved.