are you saying that Mullen hasn't had as good a run as any of the blokes you just mentioned? when in form, Mullen is any of their equals. hell, Maloney isn't travelling that well this year anyway. totally played himself out of origin contention. Mullo would be well ahead of him as far as origin goes this year.
Johnson is the only one of those blokes who i would say definitively has more potential and more raw talent than Mullen. he could be anything. that, however, is not an argument that Mullen is bad. in fact, if all 3 of those blokes were, in fact, as far ahead of Mullen as you seem to think then it still isn't an argument that Mullen is bad. Tahu isn't as good as a shitload of centres running around, but geez he's playing well and is an asset to our team. Houston has about 10,000 second rowers ahead of him, but i wouldn't trade him for just about anything. it's a flawed argument from the outset.
are you also saying Mullen doesn't make a difference in our team? we would have barely won a match without him this year. if that isn't a difference i don't know what is... unless you want to sit there and claim that we would have won as many, or more games with a combination of Stig, Roberts or Davis.
also keep in mind those other halves you mentioned have halves partners worth more than their weight in dogshit, too. Mullen is about midway as far as 5/8ths go. nowhere near the bottom of the pile, struggles to reach the top, though. with a permanent, competent halves partner that doesn't change every other week he could probably go up another level. he's nevre had that in his entire career, though. he has always had to make it all himself.
nope, i'm sorry, you're still a clown... and your last post only reinforces that.