The thing that pisses me off is that this is the only way RU gets any attention - hanging off the coat tails of the NRL. So, I’m with Gus, as soon as they sign with Union, get them out of our game.
Here’s an idea I floated on the Sharks forum on how you do it without the clubs being able to rort it, and without the players being able to just hide it until the last minute;
This dickhead that is running the ‘Rugby Australian’. He’s clearly using the Suallii signing as a promotional tool for RU, and keeps making inflammatory remarks about the NRL just to get into a media spat, to keep himself and RU in the media and feeling relevant. I think we should banish any player who signs with RU to reserves so RU get no development and no airtime from stealing RL players. I’d also say player contracts should all actually be NRL contracts, and their actual NRL contract should be for 1 year longer than their actual club deal, that way, players can’t sign on with RU on the sly to avoid being stood down. So if you sign a 3 year deal with a club for a total of $1m, it’s actually a 4 year NRL contract, and would be paid at $250k per year. If you don’t sign with another NRL club before the end of the 3 years, you’re sat not playing for 12 months on $250k. If you sign with RU 2 years into the deal; you’re in reserves and rotting for 2 years. I’m also more than happy for NRL to pay the wages for players being forced to rot, and clubs getting salary cap dispensation.
I actually think moving to a contract system like that would also have other unintended benefits, such as players who fail to land a new deal will still have 12 months of salary payments to help adapt to ‘normal’ life. The clubs don’t pay any extra, it’s just that whatever they agree with the player is actually given to the player over a total period of 1 year longer (eg club agrees $1m over 3 years which they pay to NRL, player actually gets it paid directly by NRL but over 4 years, so $250k per year). It would also make salary cap rorting easier to identify, as all monies going to the player should be going through the NRL, so any payments to a player outside of that would be easier to scrutinise. Would also make dodgy deals stand out more to the NRL (eg Wighton turning down 1.1m and then being paid 800k).
Appreciate it’s a bit ‘out there’ and would be unlikely to get through RLPA and legal bods, but what are peoples thoughts?
Would make players think twice about going if we also said they were never welcome back.