Australian rugby needs all the help it can get. Normally when you use that expression it implies they need all the help they can get 'to be a contender', but in this case it should be interpreted to mean 'to keep afloat'. They're truly f**ked. Is Joseph Suaalii really 'the guy' to save Australian rugby? I really can't see it.
But if he does ... seriously, he would have to go down in the annals of Australian sporting history (without wanting to take anything away from
@SLRBRONCOS achievements) for saving the sport? Regardless of anybody's opinion on his playing ability, it's difficult to argue that he isn't physically capable of doing it. He is a fantastic athlete ... tall, fast, agile and built well enough to handle things defensively.
He's only 21 years old and he's played with a team of genuine contenders and good coaching for a few years now, and got (IMO) an undeserved origin selection and subsequent failure. In a code with even stricter 'tackle' interpretations it's going to be difficult. Let's see how he goes....
Hang on a minute.
I'll probably just read about his success or failure in the paper and if he blitzes it I might watch some highlights? But he ain't saving rugby union by himself. Even if the Wallabies are going well it's a boring sport to watch, and has been for quite some time now. Great game to play, especially years ago but always has been an inferior game to watch and the gap keeps getting wider on that.