Sub $300k replacement probably won't be much. That is the worry.
I hope they don't, but they could let Tetevano go and play Capewell or Martin in the middle. May will be default back row off the bench and Burton could be the same.
Martin is a gun middle. I am waiting for that too happen
Sooner we get Martin in the middle the better.
Capewell is also too good for the bench...all works
Moving to the UK would be hugely expensive for Tetevano, then you have high tax rate for someone earning that much and there’s also the Covid drama. 425k would probably keep him here past 2021.
I'd hazard a guess that he's not just basing his opinion on FG games only, and instead using his form in the lower grades as well...Perplexed how you can call him a gun middle when he’s only ever played 4 games at lock in FG.
It’s also unlikely we retain Capewell, which would mean Martin having to go back to second row after one year. You’ve said yourself in the past our second row stocks are thin.
Reading between the lines of what Blade said yesterday I think Tetevanos money will be used to give some players upgrades in 2021, if we hang on to Tetevano I dont think we have the money to upgrade him or the need.
If we lose tetevano or leniu for 2021 and dont bring in another prop we are going to have to many edge forwards and not enough middle forwards so there is a fair chance one of our edge forwards gets shifted in that case.
Capewell just made origin, his price is going to go up. We’re unlikely to keep him past 2021.
I'd hazard a guess that he's not just basing his opinion on FG games only, and instead using his form in the lower grades as well...
A lot can change in 12 months though. We have Lindsay Smith coming through who is a middle forward and time to sign more guys if needed. If losing tetevano means keeping Critta and Leniu I will pack his bags myself and I really rate him. Any forward pack with Yeo, Fish, Kiks capewell and Leniu is going to be top 3 next season. Injuries can undo that no doubt but that can happen to any club.
I understand that, but to base an opinion on FG games only is a little disingenuous because of his limited time there. To say he CAN'T play there because he hasn't played in that position enough in first grade is a chicken/egg argument. We won't know until it happens - but using his lower grades as something of a measuring stick, we can say, confidently in my opinion, that he'd be at the very least serviceable in that position.We’ve all watched enough footy to know that guys that kill it in lower grades can struggle in FG. Martin is a very good footy player, but he’s easily played his best footy at second row. He’s also quite light for a prop.
Of course, but if we let Crichton walk because of exorbitant demands then we can keep him or sign another decent middle.
Is there a limit to what you’d give Crichton?
It’s not so much about Tetevano as it is about having a good prop rotation. With Eisenhuth as our 4th prop, it’s much weaker than this season. The middle is where we dominated other teams.
With the new rules, this could work to our benefit.We’ve all watched enough footy to know that guys that kill it in lower grades can struggle in FG. Martin is a very good footy player, but he’s easily played his best footy at second row. He’s also quite light for a prop.
So was I. 9th July,1973.were you there as well, I was there as well, bad day that
With the new rules, this could work to our benefit.
Perplexed how you can call him a gun middle when he’s only ever played 4 games at lock in FG.
It’s also unlikely we retain Capewell, which would mean Martin having to go back to second row after one year. You’ve said yourself in the past our second row stocks are thin.
I'd hazard a guess that he's not just basing his opinion on FG games only, and instead using his form in the lower grades as well...