In your opinion he is. It shouldn't be a hook or Ivan thing there is many good coaches out there.
Let's go purely on winnage % the following current coaches have better records than Ivan.
Bellamy 68%
Robinson 63.3%
Seibold 63%
Bennett 62%
Des 58.2%
Paul Green 56.4%
Maguire 55.6%
Flanagan 55.1%
McGregor 50.4%
Ricky 48.4%
So on win % he is 11/16.
3 on that list were available. All had won comps. Hell even Toovey made a GF and better %
Then of course hook was fired with a 55.5%
So Ivan was better to keep Nathan but the best coach hardly... Let's give him a 5 year deal to make it worse
How many of those have had to rebuild 3 clubs? Cleary teams tend to punch above their weight.
Cleary was the first and only ever coach to have the Warriors playing consistent footy.
He then came here and spent 3 years rebuilding our club before having a decent roster by 2014.
He then went to Tigers where he had to rebuild them. While rebuilding those sides all punched above their weight.
He has never gone to a club with an established roster and the resources we had. But yeah compare the win percentage of a coach who has rebuilt 3 clubs to guys at powerhouse clubs with more resources then Ivan has ever had.
Hes not better then all of that list. But hes not worse then them all either and hes certainly better then Hook who has his team achieving the bare minimum you would expect them to.