Link please.
That expandable salary cap keeps on expanding...
It's in the Daily Telegraph, not bothered getting it.
You know Eastwood is going to Leeds? and we had money under the cap.
You know Eastwood was signed on a cut-price deal after his original UK deal fell through? Him leaving means absolutely nothing when you've managed to sign Halatau, Paea, Tia Kilifi as well as upgrade Goodwin and so on.
You know Eastwood was signed on a cut-price deal after his original UK deal fell through? Him leaving means absolutely nothing when you've managed to sign Halatau, Paea, Tia Kilifi as well as upgrade Goodwin and so on.
Add Steve Turner and Blake Green to that list.
All of them wouldn't be what SBW and Reni Maitua were on...
El Masri???? goose... Blake Green would be on peanuts and to suggest otherwise is crap!
I think you spent that when you signed Kimmorley,Morris,Hannant,Ennis and Stagg you merkin.
No you goose... Maitua was sacked during the off season you GOOSE! All of them also with the exception of Stagg signed before SBW left...
We've lost SBW, Sherwin, Mason, O'Meley, Maitua, Corey Hughes, Willie Tonga all since 2008 (Plus a lot more) and they would've been on more then everyone we've bought since!
SBW, Mason & Sherwin (Remember he was signed on a contract that got bigger over 5 years) alone were on 1.2 million per year between them. Stop talking from your ass unless you know exactly how much these players signed for! As i said the NRL wouldn't let the Bulldogs get away with anything...
Mason, O'Meley and Sherwin played elsewhere in 08 how does that have any bearing on who you signed for 09.
Because you goose they didn't sign anyone in 2008 to replace them HENCE the money was free in 2009 + SBW leaving + Reni = enough for Stagg, Kimmorley, Ennis, Eastwood, Morris and lots left over!!!!!!
People seem to have selective memories...
How does that work? If my side spent only 3.5 million this year does that mean that we have an additional million to spend next year? Doesnt sound right.
Of course it does... If the squad is worth in $3.5 million in 2008 and came last, i don't think anyone would get upgrades (Which they didn't) hence it's still on $3.5 million in 2009 + They lost SBW And Reni = more money for 2009 (3.5 Million is just an example). That's how we could afford all those players (Kimmorley, Ennis etc) this year AND we still were under the cap...
How does that work? If my side spent only 3.5 million this year does that mean that we have an additional million to spend next year? Doesnt sound right.