OK I will play the sucker for the benefit to all on here.
Why if players are contracted using the Cap allocated by the NRL does Gardner have to pull the financial strings. If all players are signed and paid under the Cap why would it effect Wests in anyway. Success by the Knights would reflect positively with Wests and the opposite with failure.
I understand that other costs would be Wests problem but those costs would be similar if you finish top 4 or bottom 4 unless of course some things are done underhandedly.
Wests and Gardner would look much better, especially with Newcastle and Knights fans with a successful team. Gardner is the person that is reported to, surely, and those running the football side report to him and success and failure should be with them and if success Gardner basks in that and if failure then he sacks and finds someone hopefully better.
Please forgive a naive fan.
The thing is, the Knights are a separate entity - fully owned by Wests, however it is a separate company and has its own board of directors. The Knights aren’t like one of the hotels or gyms that Wests own - they are a separate entity.
Gardner is the CEO of both. He actually has a bit of a conflict of interest because he is making decisions that could be adverse to either Wests or the Knights - I don’t know how he adequately does that. He also has the responsibility of managing members assets and funds - Wests are a not for profit organisation.
I know I’m alone in thinking he hasn’t done a great job managing the Knights - a shiny new training facility majority paid by the State and Federal Governments has everyone super impressed. The churn of staff, lack of consistency and stability (which leads to how we develop our juniors) and ultimately results on the field concern me.