Yeah Laundy plays the role of business backer but the $10m sugar daddy allowance from the leagues club is the biggest leg up they have over most clubs.Having Arthur Laundy involved helps them more than most people realise.
I'd be going for Atkinson over Hynes if we are looking at pilfering the Sharks halvesThe sharks seem off Hynes, maybe if they get bounced out in straight sets again he's an option
The Bulldogs came 6th, massively over achieved and got bounced out first weekI think perspective is important- Bulldogs were wooden spooners in 2021. They've made great progress with a pro steering the ship. 3 x Premiers Panthers were almost insolvent in 2011.
I'd be going for Atkinson over Hynes if we are looking at pilfering the Sharks halves
Cheaper and objectively a better player right now based on Sharks form in 2024
I clearly stated that in my first post - retireSo do you want Gardner to be responsible or not responsible for the results of the club?
run the football business without interference and micro managing of Gardner ( this has been reported ad nauseam - the staff turn over during Gardner tenure is alarming)you still haven’t answered my question of what changes exactly for Parr if Gardner retires tomorrow?
Ok Phil , so we cannot compare the Knights to others. The Knights are a special case. What is an acceptable time frame to a Premiership in your opinion ? 10 years from now ? we've finally achieved mediocrity when do you see a Premiership? or not even a Premiership - when do you see being better than average is achievable ?With respect to the bulldogs, they’ve had one good season where they crashed out first week of the finals, how’s that any different to us in 2020 where we finished 7th after being wooden spooners in 2017? Making the top 8 isn’t that hard as we have shown, there’s a big difference between that and having sustained success like the storm, panthers and roosters have.
On the topic of the bulldogs it’s very hard to compare them to us, it’s a completely different structure, for Wests the knights are part of the business where commercial and financial KPIs exist, the Bulldogs survive solely because they have a very successful leagues club that literally gives them $8-10 million every year, Gus essentially has the same job as Peter Parr (general manager of football) but doesn’t have any financial checks and balances that any sustainable business would otherwise have.
Mind you Gus still answers to Adam Driussi who’s the chairman the same as Parr answers to Gardner.
So you think new unnamed CEO of wests is the answer despite not knowing who this CEO could be and not knowing what the directive is from the wests board.I clearly stated that in my first post - retire
run the football business without interference and micro managing of Gardner ( this has been reported ad nauseam - the staff turn over during Gardner tenure is alarming)
Ok Phil , so we cannot compare the Knights to others. The Knights are a special case. What is an acceptable time frame to a Premiership in your opinion ? 10 years from now ? we've finally achieved mediocrity when do you see a Premiership? or not even a Premiership - when do you see being better than average is achievable ?