84 Baby
Referee
- Messages
- 29,805
Yeah because Tigers are obviously willing to go for thatUnless it's just a ploy from his manager to extract a higher offer from the Tigers.
Yeah because Tigers are obviously willing to go for thatUnless it's just a ploy from his manager to extract a higher offer from the Tigers.
Sorry Barry but I'm not sure what you're basing that on. I think it's fair to combine the "coke stuff" into a general drug issue and if you're comparing arrests/charges there were 19,027 legal actions commenced by Police in NSW last year for drink driving (Source: BOCSAR) and 29,509 consumer and provider drug arrests in NSW in 2014-15 (Source: Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission).They'd also think that drink driving isn't such a big thing. I have no sympathy for the players involved in the coke stuff, but drink driving is 100 times more of a social problem,
What about TMM from penruff ... i thought he was likely heading to the tigers?so we not getting Moses this year then?
I actually wonder how many NRL players are getting a first strike and it all goes unheard of and is swept under the carpet? .... the media only get hold of the ones that have the police involved ... how different is the nrl policy to the afl?Yep the AFL's drug problem is just as bad or even worse, the difference is the way it's reported in the media. If a player farts in RL it's the worst thing in the world and big news. The AFL media are actually to happy to talk and report on the game unlike the hacks who report on RL who are just chasing the clicks for their shitty websites.
Sorry Barry but I'm not sure what you're basing that on. I think it's fair to combine the "coke stuff" into a general drug issue and if you're comparing arrests/charges there were 19,027 legal actions commenced by Police in NSW last year for drink driving (Source: BOCSAR) and 29,509 consumer and provider drug arrests in NSW in 2014-15 (Source: Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission).
Alcohol and tobacco in general are by far the greatest burdens of disease but the specific drink driving and illicit drug issues in NSW are certainly comparable.
yeah that was the original call wasn't it, seems the talk has gone cold on him.What about TMM from penruff ... i thought he was likely heading to the tigers?
only second strikers get named and suspended like http://wwos.nine.com.au/2016/07/06/12/55/souths-auvaa-allegedly-records-nrl-drug-policy-strikeI actually wonder how many NRL players are getting a first strike and it all goes unheard of and is swept under the carpet? .
Agreed. I think you'll find there were more drug-related deaths in Australia then there were from crashes involving a driver or motorcycle rider with a blood alcohol concentration above the legal limit.Firstly, I was not referring to the relative incidence of forms of behaviour, I was referring to the consequences of each illegal act. We don't set penalties in proportion to the number of offenders (well..we shouldn't at least).
The number of arrests does not measure the extent of the social harm caused by behaviour. That measures how many people get busted doing something that is deemed to be illegal. It doesn't measure the harm done by the illegal activity.
Social harm comprises (among other things) physical and mental harm (and deaths) caused, the cost of treatment etc. Getting into a car off your skull and driving exposes you and other poor bastard in your way to a credible risk of death.
the AFL's policy is far more lenient. how different is the nrl policy to the afl?
yeah that was the original call wasn't it, seems the talk has gone cold on him.
has the board given him the full backing yet? that's the ultimate kiss of death.Or Penrith are about to sack another coach....
Using illegal drugs supports organised crime. In some places these f**kwits are so strong they terrorise the poor merkins living in their territories. All enabled by a bunch of safe, wealthy middle class deadshits wanting to get their rocks off.
Yeah shits me no end when people say it's victimless. Mother Teresa isn't the one supplying the stuff
That's right. These drugs are addictive and harmful to your physical and mental health, whether they are legal or not.
I'm not saying they should be legal but if that's your arguement so are tobacco and alcohol
I think tobacco should be illegal. But you need to drink a LOT of alcohol to experience health effects. The vast majority of people manage their alcohol use without issue. The pros outweigh the cons.I'm not saying they should be legal but if that's your arguement so are tobacco and alcohol
I seem to recall that Norman's consorting event occurred on the same night as the drug possession. A bit raw to say the drugs were his second offence when he hadn't been warned for the first one.