What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Obscene Assassin

First Grade
Messages
6,320
Is Johnson a better goal kicker than Moses?

Johnson's career stats are 326/436 74.77%, worst year being 2015 when he dropped down to 68.57% and his best year being 2017 at 78.95%

Moses' career stats are 154/207 or 74.4%, worst year being 2016 when he kicked at 62.32% and his best year being 2017 where he kicked about 83% across Parra amd the tigers. Didn't count his first 2 years as he only attempted 9 goals, 2 out of 4 in his first year 5/5 in his second year

Stats are from rugbyleagueproject.org
 

Happy MEel

First Grade
Messages
9,852
IMO a spine of:

1. Hayne
6. Norman
7. Johnson
9. Mahoney

Has much better prospects of playing finals footy than what we currently have. Mahoney is our best option at hooker as far as I’m concerned. I would prefer a better option on the bench like Seggy, but worst case Mahoney plays 80 and We have another big bopper or Salmon off the bench. If Mahoney’s not up to 80 mins of NRL (which I think he is), then maybe Pritchard gets a start on the bench.
 

Happy MEel

First Grade
Messages
9,852
The other immense benefit of SJ possibly coming onboard is that he is at his best when he is effectively playing “parra ball”. We are also at our best (albeit inconsistently) when we are playing “parra ball”.

Our structure should be the pigs to try and win the ruck/get into an attacking position and then the halves backs to throw it around until an opportunity presents itself. This is exactly how SJ works.

Formal attacking structures simply don’t work with our roster and culture, so we need to develop a roster that suits our style of play.

SJ, come on down :pray:
 

Happy MEel

First Grade
Messages
9,852
Wouldn't we be better off developing a roster that suits the style of play that works? It's not 2017 any more. The game has changed.
Who’s to know what style of play will work in 2019, let alone 2020 and beyond. It just takes one minor rule change or
Interpretation to completely change what is successful. I’d much rather focus on the style of play that has historically been more successful for us and build around that.
 

Captain BF

Juniors
Messages
1,973
What chance at a place in the 8 would you give this 17?

1. Hayne
2. Fergo
3. Mennings
4. Gutho
5. Gennings
6. Norman
7. Johnson
8. Paulo
9. Pritchard
10. Alvaro
11. Lane
12. Ma'u
13. Brown

14. Mahoney
15. Moeroa/Niukore
16. Mannah
17. Evans/Terepo/Kaufusi
Has Niukore been re-signed? I haven't read here very thoroughly lately and may have missed it, if so, sorry.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,155
Who’s to know what style of play will work in 2019, let alone 2020 and beyond. It just takes one minor rule change or
Interpretation to completely change what is successful. I’d much rather focus on the style of play that has historically been more successful for us and build around that.
No style has historically been successful for us, unless you count sporadic seasons of above-average wins amongst general season-on-season mediocrity. But when we have had fleeting 'success' it has been on the back of a play style featuring high randomness. This is because randomness favours the underdog, and we almost always have a weaker squad than average.
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
62,867
Who’s to know what style of play will work in 2019, let alone 2020 and beyond. It just takes one minor rule change or
Interpretation to completely change what is successful. I’d much rather focus on the style of play that has historically been more successful for us and build around that.

Bulk of other teams squad stay the same so I dont buy the bullshit we recruited wrong style of players. Players and coaches need to be able to adjust and that is what every other side does. So I call bullshit.

The debate on big forwards also is bullshit. The game always needs big forwards. And it always will have atleast 1 or 2 spots in a team for the big guy. Even if he is only capable of 15min stint. If interchanged reduced then they become more damaging as other forwards will be more lethargic.
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
33,975
No style has historically been successful for us, unless you count sporadic seasons of above-average wins amongst general season-on-season mediocrity. But when we have had fleeting 'success' it has been on the back of a play style featuring high randomness. This is because randomness favours the underdog, and we almost always have a weaker squad than average.
Which goes back to shit coaching/recruiting post Brian Smith.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,155
Which goes back to shit coaching/recruiting post Brian Smith.
By the time Smith was finished at Parramatta every other club was doing the same thing as us, recruitment-wise (i.e. poaching gun juniors and 'developing' them to beat the salary cap). In that environment it just came down to who could spend the most on players.
 

Eelementary

Post Whore
Messages
57,129
What chance at a place in the 8 would you give this 17?

1. Hayne
2. Fergo
3. Mennings
4. Gutho
5. Gennings
6. Norman
7. Johnson
8. Paulo
9. Pritchard
10. Alvaro
11. Lane
12. Ma'u
13. Brown

14. Mahoney
15. Moeroa/Niukore
16. Mannah
17. Evans/Terepo/Kaufusi

Imo, honestly, that is a top 6 side, and possibly even top 4.

Johnson is inconsistent, but still better (and more consistent) than Moses, and that pack is a great balance between size, mobility, and line-running.

I've not had an issue with our booking options - Pritchard has already had some Man Of The Match performances, and Mahoney will only improve.

If that is our side for 2019, I'm excited!
 

Eelementary

Post Whore
Messages
57,129
So, Johnson's inconsistency is several steps above Moses's inconsistency? If so, does that make Johnson more inconsistent?

Lol yeah - I probably didn't phrase myself correctly.

I meant that Moses at his worst (imo) is like a 2 or 3 out of 10.

For me, Jonson at his worst is like a 5 out of 10 - so even though Shaun has his inconsistencies, he is a way better player than Moses.

Imo, of course.
 

Obscene Assassin

First Grade
Messages
6,320
Lol yeah - I probably didn't phrase myself correctly.

I meant that Moses at his worst (imo) is like a 2 or 3 out of 10.

For me, Jonson at his worst is like a 5 out of 10 - so even though Shaun has his inconsistencies, he is a way better player than Moses.

Imo, of course.

Watching the NZ vs England test earlier today and focused on Johnson in attack. When he gets the ball close to the line, especially 2 passes wide it seems like something is going to happen and is a real threat. His 5th tackle options, especially when the defence holds off him is unlike any other in the competition.

Saying this though he's very similar to Moses in playing style, he's just a better player overall but would also be costing 200-300k more. I don't think the trade would be overly beneficial for us other than the fact that we'd be able to get rid of moses. We'd still be facing the same problem that we did this year with both halves wanting to have full control of the team, neither would want to take a backseat.

I still believe the best option for next year would be going with Norman and Brown as the halves.
 

Latest posts

Top