Playing the negotiation game is one thing, but if you low ball first up and another club comes in before you up your game with a substantially bigger offer you might get caught flat footed and lose out.
he would be our first forward picked, he’d be first NZ forward picked on form this year.
Offering him the lowest wage of any of our starting forwards is a joke.
So Matterson who lost his place in the starting team for a game and rumours of being on the outer is on $500k+, and our best performing forward with RCG this year gets offered $425K? OK, sure that will work.
When you low ball someone there is an art to it and you need to know what the smart low ball figure is. That was just ridiculous. The market is in a fever state right now for the obvious reason of the new franchise entering an already intense market. So we need to be smart and come in with a reasonable offer to the players we want to keep and not give them cause to trigger the open market option where anything can happen.
He should have been given $500k offer up front and that way the he and his manager would probably not have felt insulted and therefore not opted to go straight to the open market. Then they could have sat down like proper negotiators that want a similar outcome, somewhere the player wants to stay and play and give a little back to the club and coach that helped him realise his full potential.
Instead we have created a full on adversarial atmosphere. A you against me scenario. So off to the open market we go merkins and now you are going to pay close to what others think I am worth or I may say thanks for the memories, but pop the Champaign bottle and fill my glass. See ya later suckers! Ooh I love how those bubbles make my nose tickle. Now pass the caviar losers and turn up the music. Make it rain baby, make it rain!!!