What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,420
So is putting shit on my insights and what really happened. Being an apologist for every bad decision that the club makes is getting boring. So is going opposite to every post a user makes on this forum, which you do EVERY SINGLE f**kING TIME.

And because you consistently do it you look like a hypocrite. I like it more when you post to your strengths. Analysis of the game and statistics.

Food for thought.

Merry Xmas, Pou.
I know how risk works mate. I get paid to help execs tell the difference between two numbers. I also know that randomness is always a factor and hindsight is 20/20. Putting shit on people who need to make decisions in the face of uncertainty is for dopes and big noters.
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
34,432
I know how risk works mate. I get paid to help execs tell the difference between two numbers. I also know that randomness is always a factor and hindsight is 20/20. Putting shit on people who need to make decisions in the face of uncertainty is for dopes and big noters.
We f**ked up with Ice. Simple as that. And we could have got him for less than our final offer which he rejected. Do you like those numbers?
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,420
Not always.
It doesn't have to happen always. They're not gambling, they are maximising player value over the entire squad, over multiple years. The system only needs to minimise paying overs, while maximising the number of players on unders. Any individual player is meaningless in the grand scheme of things.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,420
We f**ked up with Ice. Simple as that. And we could have got him for less than our final offer which he rejected. Do you like those numbers?
I'd rather we lose any player than overpay based on half a season of good footy. Why was he so ordinary in his previous sixty games? The bloke is obviously lacking something. Paying him based on a single off season and a handful of games was high risk. You're acting like he was a player who had achieved something at the time.

Let's just enjoy the two years we had him on massive unders, and let the Tigers hope he can maintain his form for the 72+ games they're paying him for.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top