- Messages
- 77,903
You’re full of shit.I am the forum guru. The bearer of hope. Remain patient my son. Good things will come.
You’re full of shit.I am the forum guru. The bearer of hope. Remain patient my son. Good things will come.
I don’t think Potter is a SuperCoach. Look at how he did at the Tigers.And them flogging us (which is a data point overweighted by Eels fans) had as much to do with our f**kup as anything Mick 'Supercoach' Potter cooked up.
Nobody's saying Barrett is a good coach ffs. He has a worse record than Mick Potter, who is also shit. Are you suggesting we would've improved under Potter? If so where is your evidence, besides Occam's Razor that you don't understand?Well if Barrett wasn’t a negative factor in how the bulldogs were playing then he should have no trouble getting another head coaching gig very quickly.
You’re full of shit.
Doggy....Do we at least get a position?
I see no flaming. Just constructive feedback.LOL I said I wasn’t comparing anything other than a 19 year old half’s defence. But hey, flame away at Jake. I guess my bad for leaving the gate open.
Not saying that at all. I’m saying coaching has a tangible effect on how a team plays. The change of coach at the Bulldog reflects that.Nobody's saying Barrett is a good coach ffs. He has a worse record than Mick Potter, who is also shit. Are you suggesting we would've improved under Potter? If so where is your evidence, besides Occam's Razor that you don't understand?
Even Dylan Brown makes poor decisions. It's a feature of young players ffs.Now do Sam Walker.
Not comparing. Just saying.
And that's why he's in the top 17 not just the top 30.Sam Walker has a lot of other strengths that contribute to him being a net positive so the Roosters are willing to wear his poor defence.
But coaching is about the roster and luck, not actual coaching ability. So maybe they are both really f**king good coaches but just unlucky with the rosters they've had....Nobody's saying Barrett is a good coach ffs. He has a worse record than Mick Potter, who is also shit. Are you suggesting we would've improved under Potter? If so where is your evidence, besides Occam's Razor that you don't understand?
Yeah the Mole does that all the time. If we sign anyone, he’s a genius. If we sign nobody, he was on the money but the deal fell through.I see no flaming. Just constructive feedback.
Yeah the Mole does that all the time. If we sign anyone, he’s a genius. If we sign nobody, he was on the money but the deal fell through.
You’re right but Gronk seemed to imply it was a double standard that Jake Arthur gets criticised for his poor defence whilst Sam Walker doesn’t.And that's why he's in the top 17 not just the top 30.
My little birds disagree. Expect a signing tomorrow to be announced.
You’re right but Gronk seemed to imply it was a double standard that Jake Arthur gets criticised for his poor defence whilst Sam Walker doesn’t.
Walker's tackle efficiency is up there with Moses':Sam Walker doesn't play for the Eels if he did he would be roasted.
Merkin | Tackle efficiency |
---|---|
Arthur | 88.4% |
Moses | 82.8% |
Walker | 81.6% |
HuntWe have untill 5pm tomorow. Lets see who we sign. My little birds tell me we land someone and its not Tapau. If the names right then I reckon most will be happy
How do you idiots not understand you're cherry-picking games ffs? Souths have been very inconsistent this year. They let the Knights score as many points as the Bulldogs (to match your cherry-picking with my own).I'm not even talking about today's game. Have you actually been watching them play the past 2 months or just looking at scorelines and making assumptions on how they are playing? Go back and watch their game v the Bunnies. They played some awesome attacking footy, just a shame for them they can't defend for shit (a bit like us)....
Karmichael or Ben??Hunt