What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
60,820
That’s confirmation bias. Every team looks like that sometimes (even against us), but as a frustrated fan you remember it more when it’s your team.

We have the 12th best attack according to points scored. Rabbits are 15 points behind and played a game less so I'd back then to be 12th and us 13th. Canberra also.played one less game and 10 points behijd so thst takes us to 14th
Titans are also a game less and 24 points behind. Depending what they score on the naked up game we could be 15th best. But most likely we are 14th best ATTACK.
 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,556
If they were that good they would be on too much to fit into our squad. We already have the following players on more than minimum salary:

Penisini
Sivo
Simonsson
Dunster
Russell (probably)

There’s only so much you can keep offering to new players at the same position. Adding Alamoti to this lineup would be throwing good money after bad. The solution, if you can’t ‘incentivise’ players to leave with minimal payout, is to wait for their contracts to expire, like we’ve done with Simonsson. The reason we haven’t signed a gun outside back prior to Lomax is that we haven’t had the cap space at his position.
It doesnt help when our HOF puts a notional value on each position and won't offer anyone higher than that, regardless of our need or their quality.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
151,698
How can you say that seeing we only have 26 or 27 people in the top 30?

You continue to be an epic clown that just writes garbage to get a rise out of people.

it's not the number of players but the amount of money they are on which is the more significant numbers

I think we have been bent over by the likes of Mitch, Dylbags, and Gutho, or at least their managers bent us over and MON spreads his cheeks and let it happen

then we have players like Matto et al on bigger salaries than they would get at other clubs

if it's true that we have 3 or 4 spots open and f**k all to spend, it's just a sign of how poor our salary is being managed
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
32,893
it's not the number of players but the amount of money they are on which is the more significant numbers

I think we have been bent over by the likes of Mitch, Dylbags, and Gutho, or at least their managers bent us over and MON spreads his cheeks and let it happen

then we have players like Matto et al on bigger salaries than they would get at other clubs

if it's true that we have 3 or 4 spots open and f**k all to spend, it's just a sign of how poor our salary is being managed
It’s still at least $130k X 3 or 4.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
87,183
But his long and short kicking game has been superb. Dylan's was just average.
Does that mean he has ‘stepped up’ or just that he is better at kicking? Drown is better than Luai at defence and he has a better running game. He is worse at kicking. Nobody has stepped up or failed to step up. It’s a narrative.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
87,183
We have the 12th best attack according to points scored. Rabbits are 15 points behind and played a game less so I'd back then to be 12th and us 13th. Canberra also.played one less game and 10 points behijd so thst takes us to 14th
Titans are also a game less and 24 points behind. Depending what they score on the naked up game we could be 15th best. But most likely we are 14th best ATTACK.
We’ve missed our halfback for nine games. With him in the team our attack has been quite good. Without him it’s been garbage. Whether you want to blame somebody is beside the point. The fact is we attack well when Moses is in the team.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
87,183
It doesnt help when our HOF puts a notional value on each position and won't offer anyone higher than that, regardless of our need or their quality.
I don’t think our need should come into it except at the most crucial positions. That’s a short term condition that can lead to long term negative impact. But their quality should absolutely be the main factor in the price, regardless of position.

The real question is, if MON is so bad, how did we get Lomax?
 
Last edited:
Top