Did she sign it in front of her psychiatrist? Lawyer just needs her to understand the legal ramifications. At best they are going to suggest she consider the emotional aspects but other than that all she needed to do was nodThe choice of life that they both had to endure is obviously tough. However it's pretty clear that she did not make a rash decision. She appointed a lawyer to draw up the contract and then (after I assume a few days) executed it before her legal representative.
Accordingly she was not coerced or deceived and can never claim to be. Her lawyer would have ensured that she was comfortable with the deal before execution, believe me.
Im glad we've got you to tell us all the undeniable facts baz
Wait a second... was this a conscious wording or have the Antartic Atlantean pizza makers brainwashed you?believe me.
Of course she was coerced ffs. She's in her early 20s, probably tremendously lost about what to do and she was offered offered more money than she probably makes in a year at that age...how on earth do you figure she wasn't coerced?
You may well be right ... and yeah i think bryce is probably a dopey prick .... but you have absolutely no f**king idea how it all went down - none of us doSeriously? What about someone using their money and influence to achieve the outcome they want over another person isnt the definition of coercion strides?
What's deniable about Cartwright being a slime bag?
Sorry mate you can't play the coerced card after you appoint your own lawyer to draw up a contract (I'll terminate if you give me $50k). You only do that for one reason - to make sure you get paid.
Nasty stuff. Feel for her but you cannot claim that she was an unwitting or unwilling participant to the deal. Now she regrets it, which is sad. I hope she gets closure soon, however running to the papers is not the answer.
You may well be right ... and yeah i think bryce is probably a dopey prick .... but you have absolutely no f**king idea how it all went down - none of us do
Seriously? What about someone using their money and influence to achieve the outcome they want over another person isnt the definition of coercion strides?
What's deniable about Cartwright being a slime bag?
coercion
kəʊˈəːʃ(ə)n/
noun
noun: coercion; plural noun: coercions
- the action or practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats.
"it wasn't slavery because no coercion was used"
synonyms: force, compulsion, constraint, duress, oppression, enforcement, harassment, intimidation, threats, insistence, demand, arm-twisting, pressure, pressurization, influence
"it wasn't slavery because no coercion was used"
antonyms: persuasion
Of course she was coerced. What she did after the coercion was make she didn't get screwed (pun slightly intended) but that doesn't for a single second mean she wasn't coerced.
Coercion implies the use of force or threats. It does not imply the offering of financial or other 'incentives'.
then why hasn't he been charged?Of course it is, but I'd not expect you to understand how
Coercion implies the use of threats, force, authority or power.
What about throwing 50k at a problem to make it go away isn't the use of power or authority? Or force for that matter? It doesn't have to be physical force....what kind of mental pressure do you reckon 50k puts on a worried 20 year old? Is that not using force?
Sorry Gronk. The way I read the article, the contract was provided by those associated with The Panthers. In fact it states the woman refused to sign it. It also states she was also asked to sign a confidentiality agreement.
do you know her?Of course she was coerced ffs. She's in her early 20s, probably tremendously lost about what to do and she was offered offered more money than she probably makes in a year at that age...how on earth do you figure she wasn't coerced?
It's not coercion. It may not be good, and it may constitute illegal behaviour in another sense (not talking about any particular case). E.g. if you offer a financial inducement for someone to commit crime that is illegal, but that still wouldn't be coercion.
Now, if you say, 'If you don't do X' I'm going to take your $$$/home/assets.....that is coercion..
do you know her?
How is using intimidation to achieve the result you want anything but coercion?