- Messages
- 20,933
Is Bird even being targeted as a half???
Who know's....BA probably hasn't even decided that yet if we somehow get him
Is Bird even being targeted as a half???
True, that's the problem the lack of quality options available. We had one but he turned out to be a basket case.
This is why I'd personally be pretty happy if Peats came back. Yeah his injuries are a concern, but honestly he's as good as or better than what we're likely to get on the open market anyway. He's an astute player and a great defender, good service, knows when to run and gets his forwards over the ad line. Kaysa is fine as a back up to a player like Peats.
And the constant Peats rumours must be coming from somewhere, so potentially BA is well aware of this as well and is making moves.
min ar arm t mt
lichaa 77 8 62 40 1
mccullogh 80 1 6 60 1
friend 80 1 17 57 4
koroisau 62 7 84 38 6
l brown 18 2 24 10 1
granville 59 4 44 32 3
hampton 21 1 0 11 1
cook 80 7 61 53 4
farah 7 1 13 3 0
brailey 53 2 24 25 0
segyaro 27 5 49 18 2
buhrer* 60 10 70 31 0
levi 60 3 36 39 3
hodgson 80 2 13 35 1
clydsdale 5 1 14 3 0
pritchard 72 1 4 45 6
c smith 80 6 46 42 4
wallace 80 7 28 33 3
luke 80 8 119 29 1
simpkins 45 2 29 24 1
t roberts* 49 4 55 7 0
mcillwrick 70 3 37 35 3
ballin 10 0 0 9 1
mcinnes 80 4 61 44 1
McCinness' stats are impressive!!I was bored - so i went and listed all the hookers stats from weekend games (minutes / runs / metres / tackles / missed tackles)
Code:min ar arm t mt lichaa 77 8 62 40 1 mccullogh 80 1 6 60 1 friend 80 1 17 57 4 koroisau 62 7 84 38 6 l brown 18 2 24 10 1 granville 59 4 44 32 3 hampton 21 1 0 11 1 cook 80 7 61 53 4 farah 7 1 13 3 0 brailey 53 2 24 25 0 segyaro 27 5 49 18 2 buhrer* 60 10 70 31 0 levi 60 3 36 39 3 hodgson 80 2 13 35 1 clydsdale 5 1 14 3 0 pritchard 72 1 4 45 6 c smith 80 6 46 42 4 wallace 80 7 28 33 3 luke 80 8 119 29 1 simpkins 45 2 29 24 1 t roberts* 49 4 55 7 0 mcillwrick 70 3 37 35 3 ballin 10 0 0 9 1 mcinnes 80 4 61 44 1
The young and inexperienced players like French, Gutherson and Kritchard will end up better than they currently are.Could someone do it better though?
That's the problem with this club, we have virtually an entire team of players that can perform a role fine, but if someone can do it better then aren't we better off?
McCinness' stats are impressive!!
I guess that remains to be seen. I've never rated him either but you can't argue with his start to 2017.He is a weird one. Is 2017 to date an anomaly or has he finally broken through? South Sydney fans could not wait to see the back of him last year.
With the number of dummy halves in the squad Arthur made clear his intent for our hooker rotation. Without an 80 minute dummy half option we need to use two blokes in the 17. Maybe that means using Brown for a period, especially with De Gois and King unavailable.Then he will fail as an NRL coach. Simple.
Personally I give him a bit more credit than that at this stage. I hope I'm not wrong.
Kritchard has always been in the 17 when available though.IDG is a plodder, but he is better at the basics than Pritchard and that's a big factor in why we won so many games. We also had Keiran Foran in the halves with Norman for a bunch of those wins.
Once again, you've gone off the deep end mate. You need to chill out a bit, stop taking everything so much to heart. You'll find I rate BA very highly, and I think he will be fully aware that Pritchard is not the hooker this side needs. That's why Kaysa has never been picked as an 80 minute hooker, until this season when he had no choice thanks to injuries to IDG and King.
I disagree Lichaa is trash. He is no star, but he is a genuine first grader. If we were to sign anyone I reckon he would be perfect, even more so than Peats, because Lichaa doesn't have the injury history.One thing I think may be pertinent when it comes to hookers, Brad Arthur and our apparent disinterest in an 'attacking' hooker is just how starved the NRL is for well rounded hookers. You hear fans lamenting about the lack of quality halves in the game but that honestly applies every bit to the hooking role.
I don't know how many people know this but Michael Lichaa was one of the most highly (and I mean highly) regarded and decorated junior hookers to come through in a long, long time. He owned essentially every junior representative jersey there was to be had and he turned out to be trash. Ditto for Keiran Moseley from Penrith a few years back. Billed for massive things as a hooker, out of the NRL a couple of years later.
In retrospect I would have liked to have seen us take a flyer on Damien Cook but that ship has sailed. In the end what I am getting at is that while defence is obviously a huge part of what BA wants in a hooker I don't think we should be writing him off as not wanting a #9 that can contribute more in attack.
Last year if I recall (or the year before), kaysa came off the bench and played more of a running forward type roll. So essentially this is his first crack at playing hooker or dummy half, Since his debut year. So, at the ripe age of 22, and with less then 30 games to his name and even less then a handful games he's started, you've already determined he isn't more than a 20 minute bench player. Lol.
In regard to being injury prone, imo that comment gets thrown around very loosely. Injuries have a lot more to do with bad luck, rather then a player being injury prone.
The kid will still continue to develop and improve as he gains experience and confidence.
You reckon he would've been any less expensive if we weren't doing the dodge?I think BA recognises that we've fallen into a hole as a club before by just signing what was available in an effort to fix things right away. Foran was a fantastic signing....unfortunately our board were doing the dodgy and he became far too expensive.
Because most fans only look at attack, they won't accept anyone less than Issac Luke at dummy half.He is a weird one. Is 2017 to date an anomaly or has he finally broken through? South Sydney fans could not wait to see the back of him last year.
'Complete garbage'. f**king drama queen.Now we know you're trolling. Lichaa is complete garbage. He's not even as good as Matt Keating was.
One thing I think may be pertinent when it comes to hookers, Brad Arthur and our apparent disinterest in an 'attacking' hooker is just how starved the NRL is for well rounded hookers. You hear fans lamenting about the lack of quality halves in the game but that honestly applies every bit to the hooking role.
I don't know how many people know this but Michael Lichaa was one of the most highly (and I mean highly) regarded and decorated junior hookers to come through in a long, long time. He owned essentially every junior representative jersey there was to be had and he turned out to be trash. Ditto for Keiran Moseley from Penrith a few years back. Billed for massive things as a hooker, out of the NRL a couple of years later.
In retrospect I would have liked to have seen us take a flyer on Damien Cook but that ship has sailed. In the end what I am getting at is that while defence is obviously a huge part of what BA wants in a hooker I don't think we should be writing him off as not wanting a #9 that can contribute more in attack.
'Complete garbage'. f**king drama queen.
You reckon he would've been any less expensive if we weren't doing the dodge?