the phantom menace
Coach
- Messages
- 11,660
Sigh.
Imagine the conundrums at the Dally M office leading into the awards, when they don't have a "Utility of the year" award, and they have to shoehorn players into just one (their favoured/most played) position for award eligibility...Manu for sure
I thought he was excellent this morning.if he could defend a bit better then yes, maybe
his attack is world class tho
Maybe instead of working out he's been trying to make himself less attractive to the other prisoners if he heads back inside?Well if the third trial goes against him, he’ll be all set to play prop in the prison team… View attachment 68068
It's not outrageous or disrespectful.
That would allow a 20 year old to be with a 14 year old. I don’t think you’ve thought this through.Actually, age of consent laws allow for adults to have sex with minors as long as the following conditions are true:
1. The minor is over the age of consent (16 in most states, including NSW)
2. The minor is not under the special care of the adult (who is in a supervisory role)
Personally I think the current laws are gross, and half-your-age-plus-four should be enshrined in legislation, even between consenting adults.
*Zac’ciniPerhaps he means Pen'sini?
Also, regards to signings would anyone be against signing Klemmer and playing him at lock and moving Matto to the edge? Gives us plenty of go foward with Klemmer, Paulo, Lane, RCG, and Matterson on the field at the same time.
8. Campbell-Gillard
9. Hodgson
10. Paulo
11. Lane
12. Matterson
13. Klemmer
14. F.Brown
15. Taupau
16. Hopgood
17. Murchie
Matto can move into lock later in the game and bring Murchie on the edge. I reckon that's a premiership-winning pack. Also quite mobile as well.
Why the plus four?Actually, age of consent laws allow for adults to have sex with minors as long as the following conditions are true:
1. The minor is over the age of consent (16 in most states, including NSW)
2. The minor is not under the special care of the adult (who is in a supervisory role)
Personally I think the current laws are gross, and half-your-age-plus-four should be enshrined in legislation, even between consenting adults.
I didn’t say to do away with age of consent.That would allow a 20 year old to be with a 14 year old. I don’t think you’ve thought this through.
Because just half your age is too much of an age difference.Why the plus four?
Agree with all the above.Actually, age of consent laws allow for adults to have sex with minors as long as the following conditions are true:
1. The minor is over the age of consent (16 in most states, including NSW)
2. The minor is not under the special care of the adult (who is in a supervisory role)
Personally I think the current laws are gross, and half-your-age-plus-four should be enshrined in legislation, even between consenting adults.
I don’t see the problem with it. That’s why it’s half your age plus four. It’s gross for a 30-year old to be banging a schoolgirl but Dylan Brown is only 22, virtually a child himself.Agree with all the above.
But noting that half-age-plus-four would still make it legit now for Dylan and any 16 year old to be dating.
So if you're 50, being with a 25 year old is too young, but 29 years old is fine?Because just half your age is too much of an age difference.