Avenger
Immortal
- Messages
- 34,038
FYI. We start at 7 inches in the Balkans.I had the merkin on ignore, he didn't get the hint, so now I won't stop until he admits his dick is only the second smallest around here.
FYI. We start at 7 inches in the Balkans.I had the merkin on ignore, he didn't get the hint, so now I won't stop until he admits his dick is only the second smallest around here.
I think they should just f**k and get it over with. It would also take less than 60 seconds.Your constant bickering and attacks on each other is embarrasing to the forum.
It's time to just meet and punch the f**k out of each other. I'll take bets.
You're favourite to win. I reckon in less the 60 seconds.
And work your way down from there?FYI. We start at 7 inches in the Balkans.
without gagging?FYI. We start at 7 inches in the Balkans.
Not as embarassing as bartman finding out my penis is even smaller than his. I reckon it'll be daylight third tbhYour constant bickering and attacks on each other is embarrasing to the forum.
What may have happened is a matter for speculation. Analysis needs to focus on the evidence we have, not the evidence we don't have.That's a wonderful assumption
It's on the PFS though... so the underlying numbers may be from multiple categories, someone of which may have been impacted by external sources, making them net higher or lower (that's the start of an explanation and you didn't even ask nicely)
What may have happened is a matter for speculation. Analysis needs to focus on the evidence we have, not the evidence we don't have.
*general ledgerExactly. A PFS can't tell you what you claim it can.
You would need the detailed P&L to make that claim
It tells you the big picture, which is what matters when assessing the overall trajectory of the club. It certainly doesn't tell us who to blame, but it's not a question I'm interested in.Exactly. A PFS can't tell you what you claim it can.
You would need the detailed P&L to make that claim
It tells you the big picture, which is what matters when assessing the overall trajectory of the club. It certainly doesn't tell us who to blame, but it's not a question I'm interested in.
It’s a small consolation but I’m taking it.Best thing about this weekend and this round of footy is that at 4pm tomorrow, Bronco's won't be in the 8.
*Heath*general ledger
55% possession against the Roosters. I guess our attack was good enough today as well because we were ahead by 2 points near the end?Teams sometimes win games they 'have no right to win'. It's part of the normal range of outcomes. There's no point pissing your knickers over it.
Except they do, and without those disadvantages they might've belted us like we belted them in round one.
But teams rarely have equal possession, even over a season's worth of games. One reason is that they each place differing importance on it. Teams with quality defence can take more risks with the ball while weaker defensive teams can't afford to. Teams with good run game through the middle don't need to throw as many passes to break the line so they will (or can) complete higher. Teams without it (e.g. Canterbury) need to shift the ball, reducing their completion rate over a large enough sample. Some teams just lack composure.
No, we know our attack was good enough because we were winning at that point. We were taking unnecessary risks because we lacked composure.
Pre game one with Michael buettner.Was there TCT involvement at the Club yesterday. I must say Ive fallen well behind on their pods etc so I may have missed it but I didnt see anything as I usually do. I noticed the big screens advertised an after match function after the game in Jacks but no mention of TCT? Hopefully alls good there.