Pazza
Coach
- Messages
- 10,345
Lucky it’s only round 3 not 23.
honestly, you guys look cooked
Lucky it’s only round 3 not 23.
I'm actually surprised that he hasn't had the decency to change his username to African-Australian Panther.honestly, you guys look cooked
So we played the worst game in about 6 years last round, but nearly won on the bell. Then we go to Melbourne with a few injuries and lost the best player in the game, and scored 5 tries each but lost.honestly, you guys look cooked
So we played the worst game in about 6 years last round, but nearly won on the bell. Then we go to Melbourne with a few injuries and lost the best player in the game, and scored 5 tries each but lost.
I think you might be cooked.
So we played the worst game in about 6 years last round, but nearly won on the bell. Then we go to Melbourne with a few injuries and lost the best player in the game, and scored 5 tries each but lost.
I think you might be cooked.
Yep fair, but doing th same thing and expecting different results is th definition of madness. That’s the point I’m making , patently not good enough and change is needed.Those are all fair observations. So what do you do? Fire everyone involved in the process, root and branch? Or try to work out where the main weaknesses are? Maybe the first option is right, but it's not 100% clear to me that it is. The shades of grey are where managerial ability comes to the fore. And yeh, we haven't got that right.
Yeh, but 'doing the same thing' is not well-defined. You can 'not do the same thing' by changing a very small element of the previous process (e.g. keep all the staff and put more emphasis on defensive training). Or you can do it by ripping everything up. Einstein's quote is one of the most misused in history.He was talking about controlled environments. The best practical idea is probably somewhere in the middle of the options described above, but neither you or I are well positioned to guess exactly where that unhappy medium is.Yep fair, but doing th same thing and expecting different results is th definition of madness. That’s the point I’m making , patently not good enough and change is needed.
No doubt Ryles expected the halves to be his building block, and he’s been dealt an unnecessary sh*t hand, basically due to the poor performance of the recruitment and negotiating team.
So we played the worst game in about 6 years last round, but nearly won on the bell. Then we go to Melbourne with a few injuries and lost the best player in the game, and scored 5 tries each but lost.
I think you might be cooked.
“Vhy vould I choose between butterscotch or peach schnapps, vhen I could simply drink both?”Einstein's quote is one of the most misused in history.
You still haven't gotten out in the real and touched some boobs yet huh???So we played the worst game in about 6 years last round, but nearly won on the bell. Then we go to Melbourne with a few injuries and lost the best player in the game, and scored 5 tries each but lost.
I think you might be cooked.
Hope it is, losing the 5/8 isn’t a good start or it could be te beginning of a reset. Still have doubts on R&R until proven wrong ( one of few times I hope that occurs )And we have done it by ripping out the previous and stale coaching staff, by releasing our long-standing captain, by increasing the injection of youth and by seemingly adopting a speedier style of play.
Might be enough.
Who knows?
It all costs money.It is sad to see the level of player development at Melbourne and Penrith compared to Parra. I take it they identify talent better than and then have culture and good coaches below Bellamy and Cleary.
If the 17th best halfback (for example) in the NRL still has a job, why shouldn’t an average CEO or head of recruitment?Yet the CEO and recruitment still have a job, because the money is coming, I guess who gives a shit if ur a joke…..poor fans
He was right about Cleary. He was no better than Robson. Just like you whingers were right about Talagi. He couldn’t tackle. But teenagers improve. We saw it with Cleary, we saw it with Drown, and we will see it with Talagi and a whole bunch of merkins currently in our pathways. Just because the become good one day doesn’t mean they were always good.Say's Mr Bookmark himself.
Everyone remembers your stupid takes, i mean who can forget Jeff Robson mKII???
Nothing creepy about remembering your blatant stupidity.
We let them go for the salary cap benefits, not to strengthen the team in the short term.Have no issue with them being moved on, but they should've been replaced.
We let them go a year early...we could've asked for a player swap as compensation.
Agree that the senior players have to stand up
It’s as simple as being a positive influence.And it doesn't need to be a senior player that stands up. Once they run onto the field, anyone wearing 1-17 can be a leader. It's about attitude, effort and doing the 1%'rs.
Part of the agreement for Iongi would’ve been first crack at the fullback spot. Promises are part of the equation for players, even if they aren’t written into a contract. Clubs/coaches who break their promises keep that reputation and it affects their future bargaining power. Players (and their managers) talk.We signed Iongi and Williams whilst Gutho and RCG were still here for 2025.
Cleary played origin at 20, yeah he wasn't amazing but he held his own in a winning series. It was a stupid statement that looks more embarrassing by the day.He was right about Cleary. He was no better than Robson. Just like you whingers were right about Talagi. He couldn’t tackle. But teenagers improve. We saw it with Cleary, we saw it with Drown, and we will see it with Talagi and a whole bunch of merkins currently in our pathways. Just because the become good one day doesn’t mean they were always good.