Quicksilver
Bench
- Messages
- 4,361
I don't know. But U2 ain't worth a plane flight.
HahahahaI don't know. But U2 ain't worth a plane flight.
I don't know. But U2 ain't worth a plane flight.
So you see my questioning.
How can he justify all the other shit?
In my opinion 1 money = 10,000 jealousies Therefore, influence is evened out, but is always in favour of the squeaky wheels. & then there is the straight out corruption money. Like GETUP trying to overthrow the government using the great communist's billions. Or Eddie & macca the miners or any of the fifty union leaders jailed over the last 50 years for theft & fraud. Now thats influence.You don’t think money brings influence?
You think everyone acts out of a mission to do the right thing?
What kind of hippie are u?
In my opinion 1 money = 10,000 jealousies Therefore, influence is evened out, but is always in favour of the squeaky wheels. & then there is the straight out corruption money. Like GETUP trying to overthrow the government using the great communist's billions. Or Eddie & macca the miners or any of the fifty union leaders jailed over the last 50 years for theft & fraud. Now thats influence.
Well, I don't know. People need to go about their lives. Maybe it's the only overseas trip he's ever taken, I don't know. Maybe he purchased carbon offsets (which is really only a partial solution, but probably better than nothing).
Flying by plane anywhere is one of the worst things you can do for your carbon footprint. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any other option just at the moment.
We can pick the low hanging fruit though. Electricity production can be done greener. So can vehicle travel around cities. So can a number of other things.
his office is in America.
He flys for work all the time.
this is the type of climate change warrior I am sceptical about.
This is the type I have been talking about all along.
I haven’t even got to the rest of the hypocritical shit that goes on by him.
March and scream at scomo
Then get a plane overseas to see a band you’ve just seen here.
U2
More hypocrites.
imagine the size of their carbon foot prints
Aren't you like that? You acknowledge climate change but don't think the government should act on it.
No ..I’m saying
They acknowledge it
Scream about it
Lay blame on someone
Then do shit that is exactly opposite of what they preach.
Get it?
Well yeah there would be a difference because they've had vastly different policies in this area.
That was what the rise of Tony Abbott was all about.
Better still, it appears your mob are about to be over run by nutters like us, ensuring that no matter what, commons sense will prevail over bullshit.Ok well that's fun to rant about I guess.
In the meantime we have a government that pokes fun at climate change and do anything they can to avoid action. And they have by far the most power to do anything meaningful (except for maybe business, but profit will always be the strongest motive for them (as it probably should be))
No ..I’m saying
They acknowledge it
Scream about it
Lay blame on someone
Then do shit that is exactly opposite of what they preach.
Get it?
But if someone is unsure of how they can help in every single area of their lives, or struggles to find a greener solution in one area, or needs help or leadership from government or other organisations in one area, but often tries to live a life that will help our children have a less climate ravaged future, I'd say they are genuine in their desires. They are on the right path, but haven't got everything right.
Better still, it appears your mob are about to be over run by nutters like us, ensuring that no matter what, commons sense will prevail over bullshit.
I'm doing my best to protect furutre humans. My utmost to help this country. The biggest threat & danger, is people like you, wishing for deindustrialisation & fantasies of a free socialist state.
Sometimes the charge that someone is hypocritical is used to suggest the standards they hold must not really be important. I think it is often more reasonable to see it as the person does hold the standards, and for a good reason, but has failed to live up to them because they have human weaknesses (though there definitely comes a point if a person never does what they say they should, they are clearly just paying lip service to their ideals).
Most of us fail at some point to live up to standards we think are important.
It does make us hypocritical, but to me, that is like being a liar; we all do it sometimes. It doesn't mean we can't have high standards.
I've also seen people get accused of being hypocritical if they mostly do what they say but they're not saints.
For example, I say I respect other life forms, and people say I'm hypocritical because the vegetables I eat come from farms that have cleared away native life forms to grow vegetables. It doesn't mean I secretly don't care about animals, it just means I have to eat and haven't yet found the perfect solution.
If someone absolutely doesn't make any private changes to their lifestyle to address climate change, but insists others do and that governments do something before they do, I think they are paying lip service.
But if someone is unsure of how they can help in every single area of their lives, or struggles to find a greener solution in one area, or needs help or leadership from government or other organisations in one area, but often tries to live a life that will help our children have a less climate ravaged future, I'd say they are genuine in their desires. They are on the right path, but haven't got everything right.
I'm not sure which situation your mate is in. Possibly only he could judge, but you seem to think he could do a lot more. Perhaps you could point that out to him?
Better still, it appears your mob are about to be over run by nutters like us, ensuring that no matter what, commons sense will prevail over bullshit.