- Messages
- 29,225
So are we going to get independent doctors for all injuries, or just concussion injuries?
The blood bin as well. Broken legs. Everything.
So are we going to get independent doctors for all injuries, or just concussion injuries?
So the same qualified doctor who can advise a player if its safe or unsafe (and not let them back on the field) to continue with a muscle strain or a broken bone etc suddenly can't be trusted to make a decision on concussion?
How do you solve disputes?
Stay with club doctore but I'd take two points off souths and parra both and let clubs know it will be points every time they are found to have broken the rule.
So the same qualified doctor who can advise a player if its safe or unsafe (and not let them back on the field) to continue with a muscle strain or a broken bone etc suddenly can't be trusted to make a decision on concussion?
It's unlikely you would need to provided they do their duty and the clubs would be less inclined to pressure the club doctor with another doctor there watching. It would empower the doctors and remove the need for independent doctors, which imo would only reinforce a culture where doctors put the clubs needs above the welfare of the players whenever a independent doctor isn't looking over their shoulder.
It should compliment harsh sanctions.
Maybe as they both there checking them out it would be harder to fudge it but we have seen two disputes the last two weeks, even if it is unlikely there has to be a way to decide in case of a dispute.
Don't underestimate the power of professional shaming, the doctors knew that peats and Reynolds were concussed, I don't think identifying a concussion is the problem, they have been allowed back on the field because clubs have pressured the doctors based on their employment, either explicitly or implicitly, they can't pressure both doctors and hence will be unlikely to pressure either.
oh please all the wusses.
I suppose none of the folks here jumping up and down regarding duty of care , enjoy Boxing ?
According to them ONE PUNCH to the head , should result in an end to the contest.
What crap.
The Duty of care issue is about being sued by the players in future for not being seen to provide a "safe " environment.If you folks concerned about Duty of Care , then follow another sport that has NO Contact.
Players recover at different rates and some players , take for example the boxing "glass jaw" saying.
Consider James Graham , his head potential almost took out two Souths players in the GF. In the current hysteria , you wusses would be saying both players should have been taken off and not allowed back on . Yet Graham was ok to stay on.
Wait a second , even if James Graham was not wobbly , wouldn't his brain have been just as shaken as the Souths pair? Under that concern , should James also have been forced off because of future brain concerns.
The wusses will have a field day on this......enjoy your day
In regards to concussions, I can even explain in words how geniused it is to compare RL to boxing/UFC.
Wait a second , even if James Graham was not wobbly , wouldn't his brain have been just as shaken as the Souths pair?
I know.
Don't know how any could watch Rugby League.
It's barbaric.
oh please all the wusses.
I suppose none of the folks here jumping up and down regarding duty of care , enjoy Boxing ?
According to them ONE PUNCH to the head , should result in an end to the contest.
What crap.
The Duty of care issue is about being sued by the players in future for not being seen to provide a "safe " environment.If you folks concerned about Duty of Care , then follow another sport that has NO Contact.
Players recover at different rates and some players , take for example the boxing "glass jaw" saying.
Consider James Graham , his head potential almost took out two Souths players in the GF. In the current hysteria , you wusses would be saying both players should have been taken off and not allowed back on . Yet Graham was ok to stay on.
Wait a second , even if James Graham was not wobbly , wouldn't his brain have been just as shaken as the Souths pair? Under that concern , should James also have been forced off because of future brain concerns.
The wusses will have a field day on this......enjoy your day
If he's not showing symptoms of concussion, he's not concussed.
I can understand the sentiment wrt to legal arse covering, but that's a pretty basic physiological point you've missed.
I don't follow boxing, but I imagine if you're concussed in the middle of a round the fight is called off. They don't leave you out there with bandy legs throwing punches at the air. Then there's a fair break until the next fight.
coming from the guy who said he didn't want 'legit doctors' examining his team....
we aren't discussing boxing here, we are on a football forum discussing football, and the impact on the young men who earn a living getting belted each week for your entertainment.. Stop trying to smokescreen.
boxing is a barbaric excuse for a sport. CTE is even more prevalent in boxing than it is in football.
oh please all the wusses.
I suppose none of the folks here jumping up and down regarding duty of care , enjoy Boxing ?
According to them ONE PUNCH to the head , should result in an end to the contest.
What crap.
The Duty of care issue is about being sued by the players in future for not being seen to provide a "safe " environment.If you folks concerned about Duty of Care , then follow another sport that has NO Contact.
Players recover at different rates and some players , take for example the boxing "glass jaw" saying.
Consider James Graham , his head potential almost took out two Souths players in the GF. In the current hysteria , you wusses would be saying both players should have been taken off and not allowed back on . Yet Graham was ok to stay on.
Wait a second , even if James Graham was not wobbly , wouldn't his brain have been just as shaken as the Souths pair? Under that concern , should James also have been forced off because of future brain concerns.
The wusses will have a field day on this......enjoy your day