What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Sri Lanka tour of NZ

shiznit

Coach
Messages
14,796
A mix of both I think...

The Sri Lankan bowlers started well.... but I think they were guilty of letting the game drift on too much... Maybe that was the captains fault.

Once Ronchi and Elliot got in they just plundered them...

In the chase the Sri Lankans started better than we did... But McCullum never let them settle too much... He was more proactive and even though he wasn't getting the early wickets he wanted from his bowlers he was able to create scoreboard pressure with the likes of Elliot.

Mind you... It's pretty easy to be proactive when you have 350+ on the board.
 
Last edited:

African Monkey

First Grade
Messages
8,671
My god Roscoe is low on confidence...

WTF?!?!? Did Scott Styris just make a islander KFC joke about Ross Taylor??

Yes he did lol but I think it was more directed at Taylor's love for KFC as he has admitted that he does love his KFC and Scott Styris being a former team mate would have mentioned it with no malice intended.
 

vvvrulz

Coach
Messages
13,625
Sri Lanka's bowlers are a disgrace

Full credit to Elliott and Ronchi, but it's a very average bowling attack and it was nothing but pies for the last 10 overs

New Zealand are going to be tested much more than that in the World Cup
 

Iafeta

Referee
Messages
24,357
What an amazing partnership. Full credit to Ronchi, amazing power, he times the ball so beautifully. He makes a real impact at #7, you know if he gets in for 3-4 overs even that even in that time he will surge the run rate up. Elliott, very clever innings again. His experience is paying off. I was, TBF, still surprised he did nothing in test cricket as a batsman because he has an unflappable temperament and a pretty solid technique. He gets forward and back well and can play with straight and cross bat strokes equally well. If he has a good World Cup I wouldn't be surprised if he gets a ticket for the England tour.

Pity Taylor didn't go on with the job, if he could have spent another 20 minutes in the middle it would have done his confidence the world of good. He seemed to have a bit of his old timing back with one or two cover drives and cuts. Seemed to enjoy the quicker surface.

Sri Lanka really bowled poorly, but they also had some unlucky moments. The toss was a big one to win, the ball was jagging all over the shop in the first hour and there were a lot of tentative strokes and plays and misses. After that though they were dreadful and I think it all changed when Jeevan Mendis bowled his first over of hit me balls. They have been pretty poor frankly as far as their bowlers go, particularly since the ICC changed the way the rules were regulated and decided you couldn't actually throw the ball anymore. Looking at all their averages, I can't see how they remain a relevant force particularly in test cricket when Sangakkara goes. It will essentially leave Angelo Matthews and 10 blokes who would be lucky to play reserve grade cricket in Sydney.

Great to see Boult finally get amongst the wickets in ODIs, McClenaghan is an effective wicket taker but his first over or two in a spell is usually ordinary, he needs to concentrate on hitting a length from the get go and building into a spell more patiently.
 

Iafeta

Referee
Messages
24,357
Controversy already, DRS down because of a camera being down. Guptill got a not out decision on an LBW that was about as plumb as they get. I'm sure the BCCI are noting this and will make a big case of it in its anti-DRS warfare to protect their over inflated batsmens averages.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,342
Controversy already, DRS down because of a camera being down. Guptill got a not out decision on an LBW that was about as plumb as they get. I'm sure the BCCI are noting this and will make a big case of it in its anti-DRS warfare to protect their over inflated batsmens averages.

After their test series against us, the BCCI have already said they need to have a rethink after a few bad decisions went against them.
 

vvvrulz

Coach
Messages
13,625
After that DRS farce here's another horrible call, ball lands in Sangakkara's gloves off an edge and bounces (which is still out). Given not out somehow.

Guptill living a blessed life, looking as scratchy as ever
 

vvvrulz

Coach
Messages
13,625
What the hell, DRS came back?
That's just bizarre, you either have it or you don't. What if Guptill got a century from his life?
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,342
What the hell, DRS came back?
That's just bizarre, you either have it or you don't. What if Guptill got a century from his life?

I think its an indication that umps have forgotten how to umpire

they even ask for replays when someone is out to see if the bowler has over stepped

they have become useless robots imo who's only job is to count to 6
 

vvvrulz

Coach
Messages
13,625
I think its an indication that umps have forgotten how to umpire

they even ask for replays when someone is out to see if the bowler has over stepped

they have become useless robots imo who's only job is to count to 6

Are you hinting that this is the fault of DRS?
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,342
Are you hinting that this is the fault of DRS?

more than hinting mate

its defo the fault of the DRS for mine, but I would still rather have the DRS as its much more accurate and cant be subject to corruption

then I'd bring Darryl Hair back, lol
 

vvvrulz

Coach
Messages
13,625
more than hinting mate

its defo the fault of the DRS for mine, but I would still rather have the DRS as its much more accurate and cant be subject to corruption

then I'd bring Darryl Hair back, lol

Oh yep, actually I agree somewhat in the sense that the introduction of DRS gave umpires an excuse to be lazy. I don't quite agree that it is the 'fault' of the DRS, both should co-exist properly and its more the fault of the umpires for slacking off.

:lol: at Hair. If he had any strengths is that he was willing to make a call and back himself.

There were days when Hair and Steve Randall would work in tandem (shivers)
 

shiznit

Coach
Messages
14,796
Taylor runs out Williamson on 96, he should be shot at dawn for that. Just appalling.
Williamson is just as much at fault for that run out as Taylor was... He was ball watching...

Ian Smith and Mark Richardson pointed it out on the replay...

Simon Doull and Craig Cumming are a pair of imbeciles...
 

shiznit

Coach
Messages
14,796
I think I'm the scheme of things it's better for NZ that Taylor stays in and scores a big score.

A hundred from Williamson is really just a continuation of the form he's in... I'm happy that SL couldn't actually get him out with the ball...(apart from the dropped catch)

If Taylor can REALLY get going then this could be a key moment in our World Cup campaign... Because we know what he's capable of when he's in good form
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,588
Williamson is just as much at fault for that run out as Taylor was... He was ball watching...

Ian Smith and Mark Richardson pointed it out on the replay...

Simon Doull and Craig Cumming are a pair of imbeciles...

Harsh... They were both at fault but marginally more on Taylor IMO, Williamsons call
 

MKEB...

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
5,988
Oh yep, actually I agree somewhat in the sense that the introduction of DRS gave umpires an excuse to be lazy. I don't quite agree that it is the 'fault' of the DRS, both should co-exist properly and its more the fault of the umpires for slacking off.

:lol: at Hair. If he had any strengths is that he was willing to make a call and back himself.

There were days when Hair and Steve Randall would work in tandem (shivers)

To be fair, Fred Goodall had his days. Remember when the windies refused to play?
 

shiznit

Coach
Messages
14,796
Harsh... They were both at fault but marginally more on Taylor IMO, Williamsons call
Harsh on who??

I think both of them we're guilty of ball watching so both of them are at fault... Your right that it was Williamson's call... But Williamson should still look up.
 

Latest posts

Top