Mascord's reply:
"sure mate, I'm writing far and wide column for league week tomorrow. who can I ring?"
elbusto, here's your opportunity.
Done and thanks mate!
Mascord's reply:
"sure mate, I'm writing far and wide column for league week tomorrow. who can I ring?"
elbusto, here's your opportunity.
Done and thanks mate!
The nrl should ensure each state has development officers with the number based on population. Nrl can pay or make each club contribute the funds for two officers each (guessing this wouldn't be much more then $150k for each club) for non nsw/qld states. That would give the game 32 development officers, which should help grow the club in WA/NT/SA/ Tas.
The NRL should have a goal of sides in Wa/Sa.
Every additional supporter, brings in revenue to the game in some form, additional viewers for TV ratings, increased fox subscriptions, purchase of merchandise etc it all contributes to the games growth.
By the way, if you want to see just how far behind we are in the Northern Territory have a look at this:
http://www.foxsportspulse.com/assoc_page.cgi?c=0-719-0-0-0&sID=233909
http://www.aflnt.com.au/index.php?id=292
You ain't gonna win a war with your troops outnumbered like that.
The NTRL does a remarkable job in the circumstances!
Yes. I did wonder how he misunderstood it. He is wrong about the States population getting smaller as well for what it is worth.
Was the headline of yesterdays paper "Tasmanians on average 2cm taller than in 1992"?
Titans crowd average since 2007:
07 - 21k
08 - 21k
09 - 19k
10 - 18k
11 - 15k
12 - 14k
13 - 14k
I'd so far the Titans expansion has been successful, with crowd averages as listed above higher than several Sydney clubs. Whilst it's noticeable that the crowd averages go down, the low years were when the Titans were in off-field disarray and were shambolic on the field. The years when the Tits made the finals, their crowd averages were some of the highest in the comp. There is suggestible evidence AT BEST to say the Titans franchise has failed. High averages, considerable popularity, marque players and the like.
By the way, if you want to see just how far behind we are in the Northern Territory have a look at this:
http://www.foxsportspulse.com/assoc_page.cgi?c=0-719-0-0-0&sID=233909
http://www.aflnt.com.au/index.php?id=292
You ain't gonna win a war with your troops outnumbered like that.
The NTRL does a remarkable job in the circumstances!
Meanwhile in SA
http://www.sarugbyleague.com.au/About/Board-Staff
Population 1.675 million across a State 984,377 sq kilometres - DOs job must be a hoot!
Any word on Mascord writing this up?
Yep, it's in this weeks RLW.
Was just reading it whilst on my lunch break
Great stuff. I will get one in town. Had a bit of a push from the Broncos as well about this. They got wind of the problem and have raised it with the NRL.
Great stuff. I will get one in town. Had a bit of a push from the Broncos as well about this. They got wind of the problem and have raised it with the NRL.
No evidence for this, but i have a hunch the NRL will piggy back off TouchFootball in the "Non-League" States...
- They already have the cross branding sorted, so a touch DO is promoting the NRL
- It would be much easier to implement in schools without the dangers of contact football, potentially being more appealing to teacher/ect. than AFL or Soccer DOs...
- There wouldnt be nearly as much prejudice from people that believe the AFL/NRL War.
- This is the quickest fix to RLs issue with appealing to girls; again, getting rid of the contact and no real structured attacking formations allows kids with speed/balance/natural talent, but not necesarily size, to compete.
If im right, I doubt the ARLC would leave TFA to their own devices. But they would fund DOs under the banner of Touch Football rather than RL...