hindy111
Post Whore
- Messages
- 62,867
Mitch was playing injured last year hence wonder boy was on the bench.
I thought everyone was aware of that.
Oh yeah. The phantom injury
Mitch was playing injured last year hence wonder boy was on the bench.
I thought everyone was aware of that.
How about if Nico Hynes was player 17?It would depend upon the sixteen or seventeen players available.
I haven't watched any Broncos games this year, however I note that they are still on top of the table. So I guess it's pointless me hoping they are shit. We go good against them sometimes (Ok not in Darwin). So we might win.
Not even the wrong thread, totally the wrong forum.2nd mate. We are on top.
In defence I think he will be, but in attack Asi will probably play inside Simmonson.Drown to start in the centers perhaps?
Agree with all that - but I still dont like itI qualified my statement. Waqa is a disaster, AMS was a partial disaster last week, Lumelume is a disaster too. If we get belted down that edge it will be as much a symptom of the lack of depth/planning/resources/luck as it is the selection of any given combination that currently exists within our top 30.
Well if it's so important why would you want a fresh reserve grader taking minutes off your first choice player? I mean how fatigued would Lussick have to be to be less effective than a fresh Brendan Hands? I guess we'll find out.
I'd say it means they can afford to have two of them good enough for the top 17. So no, not a coincidence but points more at resources than selections around team decisions. It seems to be a luxury the top teams can afford. Bellamy had two great dummy halves, got rid of one and now plays the other for 80 minutes. Surely he knows what he's doing? Garlick is back in the team this week but they don't seem to go any better with him than without him. Small sample, but they actually go worse.
Moses did miss two games late in the season and after he returned Jake Arthur became a regular on the bench.Oh yeah. The phantom injury
In defence at least.I reckon d Brown is goanna be at centre, and asi 5/8
I've said plenty of times that I think Hands has been decent. I think you overrated Hands because you desperately wanted Hodgson to fail, as though we were better off with Hands playing 80 minutes. My defence of Hodgson is justified by him starting every game he played.you really have a thing against hands don't you? It's obviously that important that your defence of Hodgson be justified.
ffsIn defence I think he will be, but in attack Asi will probably play inside Simmonson.
Not even the wrong thread, totally the wrong forum.
Try this one: https://forums.leagueunlimited.com/forums/penrith-panthers.82/
I actually wanted Hodgson to succeed.I've said plenty of times that I think Hands has been decent. I think you overrated Hands because you desperately wanted Hodgson to fail.
It was sticky tape ffs!!I think that was because apparently our halfback, mitchy was held together by tape.
maybe @hineyrulz can clarify
Every signing is a risk. Lane has also been hampered by injury this year. He has played fewer games than Hodgson. It happens. It doesn't mean we shouldn't have re-signed him.But all evidence pointed to the signing being a failure and that evidence proved correct.
And people call pou a trollNot even the wrong thread, totally the wrong forum.
Try this one: https://forums.leagueunlimited.com/forums/penrith-panthers.82/
How about if Nico Hynes was player 17?