The other point of that argument though is that relocation is a way of getting that club into a market that has greater potential in terms of support and more importantly greater financial independence
On that point you would say that’s worked in other competitions
Anyway all of these conversations are really mute at this point in time because there’s not going to be a side from Adelaide and there’s not going to be a side relocated from Sydney or elsewhere.
I guess I see the only possibility of an Adelaide side is through a relocation as we’re at a point where the amount of teams is already fairly high.
Tbh relocation has only worked in one instance and that was the Sydney Swans in the AFL.
Even in that case it took the Swans 14 years and being bailed out financially by the league twice to get any sort of relevance in Sydney.
People see the Swans as the poster boys of how relocation works but think about it would the Swans have the fanbase they do if it wasn't for the team going on that run to the GF in 1996 and our game shooting ourselves in the foot with the Super League War and the merger debacles that lead to Norths' demise in the first place?
If anyone bothers to look a vast majority of the Swans fanbase in Sydney are those Bears fans and fans of other traditional clubs like Balmain who decided not to support the Wests Tigers merger.
Relocation of any existing team to a city like Adelaide or Perth simply won't cut the mustard, it just causes more harm than any good.
You have to understand while the Australian sporting culture is similar to America where all clubs have moved cities at some point it is still vastly different.