MarkInTheStands
Coach
- Messages
- 15,661
So does it all boil down to whether the club sells out iuts location for money (and does it need to, with increased club grants from the ARLC on their way), or does it hold true a key element of the identity that (for many/some) makes the club in the first place?
Sure, different fans will have different views on the pros and cons of that, all views equally valid and none right or wrong. I live closer to Homebush these days, and we can argue about drinks queues and parking etc but that's not what it's about imo.
To me it's about the bigger picture of what would be behind a decision like this, and the issue of what elements of the entity make a club a club (and result in continued support). Is it the name? The colours? The nickname? The mascot? The location games are played? The individual players? The coach? Whether the club is caught cheating or not? The answer for everyone will be a slightly different mix of these, but for some/many supporters the location is (rightly or wrongly, but validly) a factor in their support.
At the end of the day supporters are (considered) transient, and so long as the club can replace the particiular supporters it might lose (through age, changing practicalities, or differences in philosophy) with new ones, then overall the club as a rugby league entity will continue to be healthy. Whatever the club decides and does and whatever each of us think about it, imo supporters past and present (and future) can all look at (or look back at) their years of experiences and of supporting the club (on the terms most important to them as fans) with pride, regardless of any issue that means they take different decisions on their future involvement.
and does being "From" somewhere mean we have to play in the Suburb?