I good friend from a study group we put together reads these boards fairly often, but is not a member. This is his favourite thread he tells me often and reads it religiously.
He requested that I forward a brief reply on his behalf.
Below is his reply -
in his own words -to ozbash's Q&A.
Don't shoot the messenger.
********************
"...he could "lift a 44 gallon drum of petrol above his head"
Let's see here. A 44 gallon drum of petrol is around 166.558121 liter. Right? So this is what he could lift above his head. Apparently.
Now, I know from having a hidden passion for conversions and some paststudies (and net research),that it's pretty difficult to convert fluid volume (litres, gallons etc) to weight /mass units (pounds, kilograms etc) accurately.
But if the the density of
water is approximately one gram per milliliter (approximately 8.3454 pounds per gallon ;or 3.7848 kilos for every 3.785412litres), then, NOT taking into consideration the density of petrol which like other liquids willvaryaccording to its temperature and pressure; if this was to be a 44 gallon drum of water, then it's weight would be app: 367.1976lb or 166.5295kg. Correct?
I'm not sure wheather
water has a much different density to
petrol (which would effect its weight), but I can't imagine there would be any noticeable or considerable difference. I'm guessing.
So, if we were to
assume for just one moment that they were identical or near identical in weight (water and petrol ie),are you telling me that this footy player from the early to mid 50's era could lift adrum of fluid above his head which weighedover166kg or over 367lb over his head?
Without knowing much more about this guy and his physical appearence, size, weight, biomechanicsetc, I've come to my own
personalconclusion. Is this possible? Well....
Probably...NOT!
BULLSHIT!
Of course, I'll eat my words, kindly,if anyone can provide worthwhile proof. Until then...
Jeremy Simmons.