By the sounds of it, bring back Mr Methane. Put him on the panel.
mate, he was just being realistic.So according ot Sticky we should just pick the Sharks to play QLD? :lol:
No Gould?
After Origin, Gould would have been perfect.
At least one, maybe two of them should be playing Origin. That much is common sense. This talk of Barrett being up to it though is absolute f**king lunacy.
I enjoyed the Stuart interview though, very honest and informative.
, but I wouldn't have Gallen, and Barrett is a joke.
.:x
I love the brainiacs behind the 2 little stat things when they preview the games.
Last night the 2 stats lines for the Dragons Parra game were...
- Dragons had won 4 of their last 5 against Parra.
- Parra had only 1 win from the last 5 against the Dragons.
:lol:
I'm glad they had that second line in there, I would never have guessed that.:roll:
So Schiltzy why wouldnt you have Gallen ? Did you not see him play Parra last week ?
He only leads the NRL in hitups
Second in metres
Up mthere in offloads
up there in tackles
Was players player against NZ
Plays with more passion than Creagh Watmough waterhgouse combined ...
JUst curious ??
I stand corrected...said the man in orthopedic shoes.The Dragons stat was actually at Kogarah, not v Parra
Well it's an opinion, I can not pick whoever I want.
I saw him against Parra, that means nothing at all. All of the Sharks looked like superstars against Parra, they always play good against the Eels and/or Parra play crap against the Sharks.
I really just think he shouldn't be there, no grub should be rewarded with rep jerseys. If he is so good and the Sharks players were good enough to be in Origin then why the hell have they been sitting at the bottom of the ladder for a couple of years. Stats and playing with passion are meaningless if you don't know how to win.
I wouldn't have Creagh or Waterhouse either anyway.
I stand corrected...said the man in orthopedic shoes.
I was half asleep, The Footy Show doesn't start here until 11:30pm.