The Joey Leilua Award

[Vic Mackey]

And that's a problem.

The MRC are working within their system and people are too dumb to figure it out.

But will push conspiracies about race and favouritism.

you literally made up how the grading system works

 

[Dingo_dan]

you literally made up how the grading system works

Sure I made it up.

I'm the one who made Latrell Mitchell a grade 2 charge and BJ Leulia a Grade 3.

I'm literally going on how the NRL have made the charges.

The intelligence of the average NRL fan is dropping at an astonishing rate.

 

[Bronco18]

The intelligence of the average NRL fan is dropping at an astonishing rate.

I too long for the days when us footy fans would quote Dostoyevsky in defending centres for whacking others across the chops.

 

[Canard]

So should BJ have gone straight to the Judiciary?

No.

 

[Spot On]

The intelligence of the average NRL fan is dropping at an astonishing rate.

Blame the refs has now become the norm for certain fans everytime they watch a match. It is ingrained in some clubs as can be seen by certain players complaining from being tackled hard to claiming every pass that leads to a try is forward and every mistake made is always someone else's fault.

Some Souths and Canberra players, in particular, lead the way in this.

 

[Canard]

Sure I made it up.

I'm the one who made Latrell Mitchell a grade 2 charge and BJ Leulia a Grade 3.

I'm literally going on how the NRL have made the charges.

The intelligence of the average NRL fan is dropping at an astonishing rate.

Provoked is not a defence.

 

[soc123_au]

BJ needs a new lawyer. he should have been downgraded due to his hit on Edwards being "heat of the moment"

It's pretty well known his tiny brain takes a while to process anything. It took 20 minutes for him to realise his bro had been injured. Case closed your honour.

 

[soc123_au]

I too long for the days when us footy fans would quote Dostoyevsky in defending centres for whacking others across the chips.

Chops mate, Dostoyevsky would be mortified at your error.

 

[Bronco18]

Chops mate, Dostoyevsky would be mortified at your error.

How embarrassing.

 

[Dingo_dan]

No.

So that sets it up right there. Because BJ didn't go straight through to the Judiciary, that clearly defined whats grade 3.

So when a week later Latrell Mitchell done an incident not at the same level, the only option was to have it a grade lower.

It's really that simple.

 

[Dingo_dan]

Provoked is not a defence.

No its not.

Which is why Latrell will be suspended for 2-3 weeks...

 

[soc123_au]

So that sets it up right there. Because BJ didn't go straight through to the Judiciary, that clearly defined whats grade 3.

So when a week later Latrell Mitchell done an incident not at the same level, the only option was to have it a grade lower.

It's really that simple.

They were exactly the same level. Both a reaction to accidental contact with a team mates head. Based on some of your bullshit interpretations of how gradings are made Latrell's was actually worse. BJ was sad because his team mate is also his brother, surely that gets some consideration in your book of excuses?

 

[Canard]

So that sets it up right there. Because BJ didn't go straight through to the Judiciary, that clearly defined whats grade 3.

So when a week later Latrell Mitchell done an incident not at the same level, the only option was to have it a grade lower.

It's really that simple.

....Mitchell done an incident....

A post after big noting your intelligence.

Both incidents should have attracted the same grading IMO, and the fine for the professional foul head high piles on the inconsistency.

 

[Dingo_dan]

They were exactly the same level. Both a reaction to accidental contact with a team mates head. Based on some of your bullshit interpretations of how gradings are made Latrell's was actually worse. BJ was sad because his team mate is also his brother, surely that gets some consideration in your book of excuses?

Latrell done his 2 seconds after his team-mate was hurt. It was all part of the same incident.

Bj done his many minutes after the incident with his team-mate (and brother). His charge was not part of the same incident that got his brother hurt (hell it wasn't even the same player that hurt his brother).

So totally the same

 

[Dingo_dan]

....Mitchell done an incident....

A post after big noting your intelligence.

Both incidents should have attracted the same grading IMO, and the fine for the professional foul head high piles on the inconsistency.

The fine for the head high is very consitent with similar incidents...

The Latrell Incident and the BJ incident were completely different.

 

[Canard]

The fine for the head high is very consitent with similar incidents...

The Latrell Incident and the BJ incident were completely different.

So what's the allowable time post incident, in your "made up on the spot" application of the rules?

10 seconds? 1 minute, 5 minutes?

 

[soc123_au]

Latrell done his 2 seconds after his team-mate was hurt. It was all part of the same incident.

Bj done his many minutes after the incident with his team-mate (and brother). His charge was not part of the same incident that got his brother hurt (hell it wasn't even the same player that hurt his brother).

So totally the same

We already established BJ takes a bit longer to process info than the average person. It's not his fault the hamster that turns the wheels was on smoko. It's all good when Latrell uses culture as an excuse for being a f**kwit, so why can't BJ be given the same latitude because of a hamster on the bludge?

 

[Dingo_dan]

So what's the allowable time post incident, in your "made up on the spot" application of the rules?

10 seconds? 1 minute, 5 minutes?

If you can't see the difference between immediately reacting to someone that's hurt a teammate and taken action immediately against the person who done it
Vs
Waiting 10 minutes and taking action against a totally different person then that says a lot.

Here's a good indicator. If the reaction happens before (or as) the ref is blowing the penalty it's in the heat of the moment.

If it happens well after the ref has dealed with it, it's unprovoked.

Here's another good indicator. Did the reaction happen to the player who committed the original foul?

 

[Canard]

If you can't see the difference between immediately reacting to someone that's hurt a teammate and taken action immediately against the person who done it
Vs
Waiting 10 minutes and taking action against a totally different person then that says a lot.

Here's a good indicator. If the reaction happens before (or as) the ref is blowing the penalty it's in the heat of the moment.

If it happens well after the ref has dealed with it, it's unprovoked

That's nice, and all invented by your imagination.

There is no excuse or mitigations for foul play.

 

[Dingo_dan]

That's nice, and all invented by your imagination.

There is no excuse or mitigations for foul play.

There is no excuse- no there's not. Which is why Latrell is will be suspended.

There is no mitigations- yes there are. Its why we have grading system. It's literally why we are argueing, because you don't like how the MRC has interpreted the mitigating circumstances in coming up with their grading.

Jesus f**king christ...

Your user pic ain't a joke is it? I'm argueing with the real Joe Exotic aren't I?