- Messages
- 29,225
Small detail. Next stop in the 50 year plan: get Freddy back to play in the halves with Nathan.Small detail
Small detail. Next stop in the 50 year plan: get Freddy back to play in the halves with Nathan.Small detail
Ivan, preaching the Guspel.Iam sure IC will keep a very low profile and let Gus the fatman have the spotlight till the season starts
Like OP said, Penrith didn't need him until the end of his contract so i doubt they would have paid him for two years. I find it difficult to believe that Penrith paid them anything TBH. WT played hard ball and Penrith backed away with plan B. They locked in Plan A a little later and for two years time.
IC saying it wasn't how he wanted it etc indicates to me he was honestly going to see out the remainder of his contract with them. WT cancelled that on him.
Seems to contradict your previous post where you said Penrith would have to pay the difference between the two contracts.
Take from me the Tigers got compo, okay it was not directly out of the Penrith’s football account but it came from IC and I guess IC will make the money up in a better contract at Riff. The amount was basically 66% of Madge’s first year contract. We will never know the real terms of the release but that is what I was told by a guy who works for the WT football operations dept. Also both Pascoe and Go have said on record they got compo
How about this suggestion.....answer the question!
Yep. I said Penrith are obliged to recompense any difference in two contracts and they probably did but IMO, and under the circumstances, I don't think they would have had to though.Seems to contradict your previous post where you said Penrith would have to pay the difference between the two contracts.
Tigers do seem to have got the best deal out of this - however are they still paying out for other coaches kicked off the bus?
Yep. I said Penrith are obliged to recompense any difference in two contracts and they probably did but IMO, and under the circumstances, I don't think they would have had to though.
IC maybe liable to Wt for the cost to find his replacement. That I would see fair and reasonable.
They do if they are on a fixed term contracts with no get out clause. You see it in movie stars who want to bail on a contract before filming starts because they got a better offer.Doesn’t make sense to me. Employees don’t generally pay compensation to their employers to get out of contracts early. Particularly not hundreds of thousands like we’re talking about here.
Clearly actively looked for another job while contracted. Crapped on about everyone getting on the bus. Went back to a club that sacked him because his boy is there. That's facts. No Nathan, no emotion, and no returning to a club that ousted him.
You Warriors fans would take just about anyoneMadge for 2 years, or Ivan and Gus for 5... I know what I'd take
In recent times literally anyoneYou Warriors fans would take just about anyone
The ball was in WT court. Ivan had been there long enough already to capitalise on the work he had already done. Another 2 years was more than enough for Cleary to at least strengthen them even further,if not,a GF appearance and maybe a title.Lol poor old Ivan was hard done by by the Tigers then? C'mon Panthers fans, no need to keep up the charade. You got what you wanted, so good luck!
How dare the Tigers, are you kidding? Penrith created a situation where they knew the Tigers would be forced to release Cleary, not against the rules but unethical and a classless act.
All we need isEveryone's a winner in this merry go round.
Panthers got their man early
Tigers got a better coach
Souths got Bennett
Broncos got rid of Bennett
well except Manly who got Hasler back lol
Winners are grinners.