The answer is there champ. I'm of the belief that super league was a well constructed plot to divide the strongest and most popular rugby competition (which happened to be rugby league) in the world. Their is a motive and means of doing such a despicable act and given the track record of union acting against rugby league, it's a reasonable and summation. Rugby league in AUSTRALIA was doing well until the Superleague fiasco rated it's ugly head. News ltd which financed the codes split had also newly made strong ties with union. For years union had been trying to usurp rugby league head on but couldn't do so. So they decided a divide and conquer tact through superleague was worth it. I've provided a motive , means and end result. You figure it out!?
Holy f**king shit. You're a 100% down the rabbit hole nutter. Previously I would have said you were simply deluded but well shit. The implication that you are charged with the education of children is truly frightening. News didn't try to seize control of League as part pf some malevolent Rugby plot. They did it because the say an opportunity to make money.
When it comes to money the concept of allegiance to a sport become irrelevant. A business like News doesn't pump millions into a project with the intent to fail. Literally everything they've ever done has a distinct profit motive. If you truly believe the dribble you're posting may I suggest you take a step back and assess where you are in your life.