- Messages
- 153,045
The Romans didnāt care what religion you preached as long as you paid your taxes and recognised them as the rulers.
stop going on about the bloody Romans
what have the Romans ever done for us ?
The Romans didnāt care what religion you preached as long as you paid your taxes and recognised them as the rulers.
I wasnāt going to get dragged into this FFS!!
So then I revert back to the Indigenous scenario I posed earlier. If 7 of our players stood themselves down on indigenous round, is your position that itās between the club and them, and accusations of bigotry have no place. The only difference here is that the current issue that has associations with the LGTBQIA+ Community make you (and others) less comfortable.Agreed, but then that's between them and the employer. Accusations of bigotry have no place.
Theyāre absolutely entitled to their beliefs and they are tolerated though. If Manly or the Eels were sponsored by Hillsong, Iād expect all the players to wear the jersey.But what about unity and tolerance for the players beliefs??? Or donāt their beliefs count???
And this is coming from someone who thinks all forms of organised religion is stupid. I donāt agree with their beliefs but they still have a right to believe them. The Manly marketing department thought it was a fantastic idea to score some extra likes from the blue check marks on Twitter with some virtue signalling. I bet they didnāt even think of what their players might think. Because who cares about what they believe.
Well no thats the entire problem .... Manly didnt read the room and decided to dictate what the room thinks ... and unfortunately made an issue where it never had to occurManly read the room IMHO
So now you are gonna just decide anyone who doesnt agree with what you are saying is doing so because they are uncomfortable with the LGTBQIA+ Community?So then I revert back to the Indigenous scenario I posed earlier. If 7 of our players stood themselves down on indigenous round, is your position that itās between the club and them, and accusations of bigotry have no place. The only difference here is that the current issue that has associations with the LGTBQIA+ Community make you (and others) less comfortable.
Think he had a few issues he needed to work through.He seems nice.
Not at all. Pou said himself that people are less likely to accept lifestyles that buck traditional values.So now you are gonna just decide anyone who doesnt agree with what you are saying is doing so because they are uncomfortable with the LGTBQIA+ Community?
I fell asleep after just a couple. Feel great today. So this is how the other half lives.I wasn't gonna drink a dozen beers last night
Don't agree. It's a conversation that had to be had. What's going to happen when an openly gay person is about to be picked in NRL ? Will they refuse to play with him ?Well no thats the entire problem .... Manly didnt read the room and decided to dictate what the room thinks ... and unfortunately made an issue where it never had to occur
But they were tolerating others. Demanding that they celebrate something they don't support is intolerance.Don't agree. It's a conversation that had to be had. What's going to happen when an openly gay person is about to be picked in NRL ? Will they refuse to play with him ?
Tolerance is a 2 way street. You can't demand to be respected and whilst not being tolerant of others.
Isn't the Manly 7's issue that they don't want to be seen 'endorsing' (for want of a better term) publicly homosexuality. Not necessarily that they wouldn't include such a player in their team or the NRL in general, but more the point that they don't want to be seen as a billboard promoting that persuasion???Don't agree. It's a conversation that had to be had. What's going to happen when an openly gay person is about to be picked in NRL ? Will they refuse to play with him ?
Tolerance is a 2 way street. You can't demand to be respected and whilst not being tolerant of others.
No of course not ..... its not about that at all .... you cant seem to tell the differenceDon't agree. It's a conversation that had to be had. What's going to happen when an openly gay person is about to be picked in NRL ? Will they refuse to play with him ?
Celebrate or accept ?But they were tolerating others. Demanding that they celebrate something they don't support is intolerance.
Have you any evidence that they didn't accept gay people? No. But acceptance just isn't enough for some.Celebrate or accept ?
Probably less celebrating, more encouraging others to tolerate those it relates toBut they were tolerating others. Demanding that they celebrate something they don't support is intolerance.
Or maybe you can't ? There seems to be a significant contribution to this argument by the "you can't force me to do that brigade". News flash to them: it's just about acknowledging that some people are different to you and that's OK. It's not that hard.No of course not ..... its not about that at all .... you cant seem to tell the difference
Have you any evidence that they didn't accept gay people? No. But acceptance just isn't enough for some.
In many quarters it is very much celebrating so the players have every right to refuse.Probably less celebrating, more encouraging others to tolerate those it relates to