Thats how business should be done behind closed doors instead of being played out in the medai like our clowns did....
Yes, but I'd be willing to bet that it was the consideration of Ben's devotion to Hook that led to Hook being given the 'we're looking at alternative coaches' time frame - and all the BS that has resulted from it.
I've asked many times in the past wtf StGI has mortgaged its strategic and management planning on the basis of keeping Hunt happy. IMO this has been
the primary cause of so many of our issues and it has to stop.
It's so intrinsically dysfunctional that Hunt ultimately comes back with 'this isn't working for me'. Totally predictable.
There's this principle I call 'parity of authority and responsibility'. You can't say that the board and management have to stay away from the footy department and, at the same time, have the players, or even worse, an individual player (and worse still, a player who colludes with the coach) dictating requirements to the board and management. Hunt's responsibility is as a player - full stop. The board and management have responsibility to make policy, strategic and management decisions and to implement them. If a player or a coach don't like the decisions - too fkn bad!
This is why StGI appear to be indecisive and weak. The management and the footy department need to really clarify their separate authorities and responsibilities - and rigorously apply them on a daily operational basis.